Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Su-Min Cho, Soo-Hwan Byun, So-Yee Ahn, Hyun-Sook Han, Sung-Woon On, Sang-Yoon Park, Sang-Min Yi, In-Young Park, Byoung-Eun Yang, Lee-Kyoung Kim
{"title":"Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing.","authors":"Su-Min Cho, Soo-Hwan Byun, So-Yee Ahn, Hyun-Sook Han, Sung-Woon On, Sang-Yoon Park, Sang-Min Yi, In-Young Park, Byoung-Eun Yang, Lee-Kyoung Kim","doi":"10.3390/jfb16030107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental implants rely on precise prosthetic design and biomechanical stability to ensure long-term success. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of non-engaging abutments in multi-unit combined screw- and cement-retained prostheses (CSCRP) using two internal implant systems: the BlueDiamond (BD) and AnyOne (AO) systems. Unlike conventional implant systems that utilize the same type of screw for both engaging and non-engaging abutments, the BD system employs a distinct screw design for non-engaging abutments. A total of 80 implants were tested, with 40 in each group. Mechanical testing included static compressive load and fatigue tests following ISO 14801 standards. The BD system demonstrated significantly higher compressive strength (326.32 kgf vs. 231.82 kgf, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 23.4% greater fatigue strength compared to the AO system. Precision fit analysis confirmed no significant deformation, microcracks, or fractures after 5 million loading cycles. These findings suggest that the BD system's unique screw design for non-engaging abutments contributes to improved mechanical performance and durability. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the long-term implications of this design on prosthetic stability and implant longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16030107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental implants rely on precise prosthetic design and biomechanical stability to ensure long-term success. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of non-engaging abutments in multi-unit combined screw- and cement-retained prostheses (CSCRP) using two internal implant systems: the BlueDiamond (BD) and AnyOne (AO) systems. Unlike conventional implant systems that utilize the same type of screw for both engaging and non-engaging abutments, the BD system employs a distinct screw design for non-engaging abutments. A total of 80 implants were tested, with 40 in each group. Mechanical testing included static compressive load and fatigue tests following ISO 14801 standards. The BD system demonstrated significantly higher compressive strength (326.32 kgf vs. 231.82 kgf, p < 0.001) and 23.4% greater fatigue strength compared to the AO system. Precision fit analysis confirmed no significant deformation, microcracks, or fractures after 5 million loading cycles. These findings suggest that the BD system's unique screw design for non-engaging abutments contributes to improved mechanical performance and durability. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the long-term implications of this design on prosthetic stability and implant longevity.

一种新型无接合基台螺钉内种植体系统的生物力学评价:比较疲劳和负荷试验。
牙种植体依靠精确的假体设计和生物力学稳定性来确保长期的成功。本研究采用BlueDiamond (BD)和AnyOne (AO)两种内种植体系统,对多单元螺钉-骨水泥联合假体(CSCRP)中无接合基台的力学性能进行了评估。与传统种植体系统使用相同类型的螺钉用于接合和非接合基台不同,BD系统采用独特的螺钉设计用于非接合基台。共测试了80个植入物,每组40个。机械测试包括按照ISO 14801标准进行的静态压缩载荷和疲劳测试。与AO系统相比,BD系统具有更高的抗压强度(326.32 kgf vs. 231.82 kgf, p < 0.001)和23.4%的高疲劳强度。精密配合分析证实,在500万次加载循环后,没有明显的变形、微裂纹或断裂。这些发现表明,BD系统独特的非接合基台螺钉设计有助于提高机械性能和耐久性。需要进一步的临床研究来评估这种设计对假体稳定性和假体寿命的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信