Using the fused graphical lasso to explore the motivational self-system after a multimedia self-regulated learning training: a brief research report.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414563
Sarah M Wolff, Jonathan C Hilpert, Matthew L Bernacki, Jeffrey A Greene, Christy Strong
{"title":"Using the fused graphical lasso to explore the motivational self-system after a multimedia self-regulated learning training: a brief research report.","authors":"Sarah M Wolff, Jonathan C Hilpert, Matthew L Bernacki, Jeffrey A Greene, Christy Strong","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of a randomized control trial designed to test the effect of a brief intervention used to improve self-regulated learning (SRL) in gateway biology courses using joint estimation of graphical models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students (<i>N</i> = 265; <i>n</i> = 136) from three sections of a hybrid-format introductory biology course were randomly assigned to participate in the multimedia science of learning to learn or a multimedia control condition. All participants completed a self-report battery of motivational measures. Course performance data was also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Network structures of motivation variables were estimated in two sub-groups (Treatment and Control). These networks showed a high level of correspondence in the relative magnitudes of the edge weights, however there were non-trivial differences in the edge weights between groups that may be attributed to the treatment and differences in predictability. While these findings suggest meaningful differences in motivational structures, the relatively small sample size may limit the stability of the estimated network models. The SRL strategy based interventions may have positioned the students motivationally to approach the challenging exam through activating the role of value and self-efficacy in their learning.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many of the ways analyses of typical intervention studies are conducted ignore the underlying complexity of what motivates individuals. This study provides preliminary evidence how Gaussian Graphical Modeling may be valuable in preserving the integrity of complex systems and examining relevant shifts in variations between motivational systems between groups and individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1414563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of a randomized control trial designed to test the effect of a brief intervention used to improve self-regulated learning (SRL) in gateway biology courses using joint estimation of graphical models.

Methods: Students (N = 265; n = 136) from three sections of a hybrid-format introductory biology course were randomly assigned to participate in the multimedia science of learning to learn or a multimedia control condition. All participants completed a self-report battery of motivational measures. Course performance data was also collected.

Results: Network structures of motivation variables were estimated in two sub-groups (Treatment and Control). These networks showed a high level of correspondence in the relative magnitudes of the edge weights, however there were non-trivial differences in the edge weights between groups that may be attributed to the treatment and differences in predictability. While these findings suggest meaningful differences in motivational structures, the relatively small sample size may limit the stability of the estimated network models. The SRL strategy based interventions may have positioned the students motivationally to approach the challenging exam through activating the role of value and self-efficacy in their learning.

Discussion: Many of the ways analyses of typical intervention studies are conducted ignore the underlying complexity of what motivates individuals. This study provides preliminary evidence how Gaussian Graphical Modeling may be valuable in preserving the integrity of complex systems and examining relevant shifts in variations between motivational systems between groups and individuals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信