Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Sphincter Injuries in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Sphincter Injuries in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.","authors":"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06110-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Women undergoing a vacuum-assisted (VA) delivery are at an increased risk of experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Studies using three-dimensional-endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) have shown that not all OASIs are recognized immediately postpartum. In primipara with VA deliveries, the presence of and the potential clinical implications of undetected OASIs are undetermined and consequently, we examined prospectively a 1-year cohort of this population. We hypothesized that the total rate of OASIs would be higher than the clinically reported rates and wanted to identify potential associated predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were examined 10-14 days postpartum with 3D-EAUS. Two experienced examiners, blinded to the clinical data, rated the results. The primary outcome was the combined rate of clinically recognized OASIs and clinically unrecognized ultrasound anal sphincter injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were included. The total rate of OASIs was 19% (95% CI 14-24; 14% clinically recognized and 5% clinically unrecognized). Prolonged second-stage/maternal exhaustion, occiput posterior presentation, and birthweight ≥ 4000g were significant and independent risk factors, increasing the odds two- to three-fold. The indication fetal distress alone or in combination with others significantly reduced the odds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About 1 in 5 primipara undergoing a VA delivery experienced an OASI and about one quarter of them were not recognized clinically. The VA procedure is a modifiable intervention, and the identified risk and protective factors may help clinicians to decide whether it should be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06110-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Women undergoing a vacuum-assisted (VA) delivery are at an increased risk of experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Studies using three-dimensional-endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) have shown that not all OASIs are recognized immediately postpartum. In primipara with VA deliveries, the presence of and the potential clinical implications of undetected OASIs are undetermined and consequently, we examined prospectively a 1-year cohort of this population. We hypothesized that the total rate of OASIs would be higher than the clinically reported rates and wanted to identify potential associated predictors.

Methods: The participants were examined 10-14 days postpartum with 3D-EAUS. Two experienced examiners, blinded to the clinical data, rated the results. The primary outcome was the combined rate of clinically recognized OASIs and clinically unrecognized ultrasound anal sphincter injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.

Results: Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were included. The total rate of OASIs was 19% (95% CI 14-24; 14% clinically recognized and 5% clinically unrecognized). Prolonged second-stage/maternal exhaustion, occiput posterior presentation, and birthweight ≥ 4000g were significant and independent risk factors, increasing the odds two- to three-fold. The indication fetal distress alone or in combination with others significantly reduced the odds.

Conclusions: About 1 in 5 primipara undergoing a VA delivery experienced an OASI and about one quarter of them were not recognized clinically. The VA procedure is a modifiable intervention, and the identified risk and protective factors may help clinicians to decide whether it should be performed.

真空辅助分娩初产妇肛门括约肌损伤的患病率及预测因素。
引言和假设:接受真空辅助(VA)分娩的妇女经历产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的风险增加。使用三维腔内超声(3D-EAUS)的研究表明,并非所有的OASIs都能在产后立即被识别出来。在VA分娩的初产妇中,未检测到的OASIs的存在及其潜在的临床意义尚不确定,因此,我们对该人群进行了为期1年的前瞻性队列研究。我们假设OASIs的总发生率高于临床报告的发生率,并希望确定潜在的相关预测因素。方法:产后10 ~ 14 d采用3D-EAUS进行检测。两名经验丰富的审查员对临床数据一无所知,对结果进行了评分。主要观察指标是临床识别的OASIs和临床未识别的超声肛门括约肌损伤的综合发生率。采用Logistic回归分析计算所选变量的比值比。结果:在334名符合条件的女性中,271人(81%)入选。OASIs的总发生率为19% (95% CI 14-24;14%临床确诊,5%临床未确诊)。第二阶段/产妇疲劳时间延长、枕后分娩和出生体重≥4000g是显著的独立危险因素,使风险增加2 - 3倍。胎儿窘迫单独或与其他联合的适应症显著降低了几率。结论:约1 / 5的初产妇在VA分娩时发生OASI,其中约1 / 4未被临床发现。VA程序是一种可修改的干预措施,确定的风险和保护因素可以帮助临床医生决定是否应该进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信