Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Sphincter Injuries in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.","authors":"Søren Gräs, Marianne Starck, Hanna Jangö, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06110-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Women undergoing a vacuum-assisted (VA) delivery are at an increased risk of experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Studies using three-dimensional-endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) have shown that not all OASIs are recognized immediately postpartum. In primipara with VA deliveries, the presence of and the potential clinical implications of undetected OASIs are undetermined and consequently, we examined prospectively a 1-year cohort of this population. We hypothesized that the total rate of OASIs would be higher than the clinically reported rates and wanted to identify potential associated predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were examined 10-14 days postpartum with 3D-EAUS. Two experienced examiners, blinded to the clinical data, rated the results. The primary outcome was the combined rate of clinically recognized OASIs and clinically unrecognized ultrasound anal sphincter injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were included. The total rate of OASIs was 19% (95% CI 14-24; 14% clinically recognized and 5% clinically unrecognized). Prolonged second-stage/maternal exhaustion, occiput posterior presentation, and birthweight ≥ 4000g were significant and independent risk factors, increasing the odds two- to three-fold. The indication fetal distress alone or in combination with others significantly reduced the odds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>About 1 in 5 primipara undergoing a VA delivery experienced an OASI and about one quarter of them were not recognized clinically. The VA procedure is a modifiable intervention, and the identified risk and protective factors may help clinicians to decide whether it should be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06110-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Women undergoing a vacuum-assisted (VA) delivery are at an increased risk of experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Studies using three-dimensional-endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) have shown that not all OASIs are recognized immediately postpartum. In primipara with VA deliveries, the presence of and the potential clinical implications of undetected OASIs are undetermined and consequently, we examined prospectively a 1-year cohort of this population. We hypothesized that the total rate of OASIs would be higher than the clinically reported rates and wanted to identify potential associated predictors.
Methods: The participants were examined 10-14 days postpartum with 3D-EAUS. Two experienced examiners, blinded to the clinical data, rated the results. The primary outcome was the combined rate of clinically recognized OASIs and clinically unrecognized ultrasound anal sphincter injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.
Results: Of 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were included. The total rate of OASIs was 19% (95% CI 14-24; 14% clinically recognized and 5% clinically unrecognized). Prolonged second-stage/maternal exhaustion, occiput posterior presentation, and birthweight ≥ 4000g were significant and independent risk factors, increasing the odds two- to three-fold. The indication fetal distress alone or in combination with others significantly reduced the odds.
Conclusions: About 1 in 5 primipara undergoing a VA delivery experienced an OASI and about one quarter of them were not recognized clinically. The VA procedure is a modifiable intervention, and the identified risk and protective factors may help clinicians to decide whether it should be performed.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion