Is relief the most common reaction to abortion? Self-assessed intensity of emotions attributed to abortion in a national sample of women aged 41 to 45.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.162063.1
David Reardon
{"title":"Is relief the most common reaction to abortion? Self-assessed intensity of emotions attributed to abortion in a national sample of women aged 41 to 45.","authors":"David Reardon","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162063.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely reported that the most prominent emotion following abortions is relief. This claim primarily rests on two studies of abortion clinic patients which had methodological and self-censure bias. Other studies have indicated that negative emotions are more common than positive emotions. The objective of this study is to obtain self-assessed data on the intensity of emotional responses to abortion and pregnancy loss in a random national sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using visual analog scales, a random sample of 1,925 women aged 41 to 45 completed a survey in which respondents rated the degree to which they experienced emotional responses to their first abortion or natural pregnancy loss. The emotions assessed included relief, grief, depression, anxiety, guilt, emptiness, anger, regret, shame, unforgiveness of self, uncontrollable weeping, frequent thoughts of the child they could have had, and difficulty completing the grief process. Women were categorized into five groups based on pregnancy outcomes, and four abortion decision types: Wanted, Inconsistent, Unwanted, or Coerced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among women with a history of abortion (n=409), negative emotions were reported more intensely than relief. Relief was the predominant emotion only among the 29.8% of women whose abortions were freely wanted and consistent with their own values and preferences. For all other groups, relief was low and negative emotions were more prominent. Emotions following natural pregnancy losses were similar to those following abortion, but less severe following wanted abortions and more severe following coerced abortions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relief is only common after freely wanted abortions. Most abortions are inconsistent or contrary to women's own values. In these cases, strong negative emotions are far more dominant than relief. These results should inform pre-abortion screening, counseling supportive of women's own values and preferences, and mental health support post-abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.162063.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is widely reported that the most prominent emotion following abortions is relief. This claim primarily rests on two studies of abortion clinic patients which had methodological and self-censure bias. Other studies have indicated that negative emotions are more common than positive emotions. The objective of this study is to obtain self-assessed data on the intensity of emotional responses to abortion and pregnancy loss in a random national sample.

Methods: Using visual analog scales, a random sample of 1,925 women aged 41 to 45 completed a survey in which respondents rated the degree to which they experienced emotional responses to their first abortion or natural pregnancy loss. The emotions assessed included relief, grief, depression, anxiety, guilt, emptiness, anger, regret, shame, unforgiveness of self, uncontrollable weeping, frequent thoughts of the child they could have had, and difficulty completing the grief process. Women were categorized into five groups based on pregnancy outcomes, and four abortion decision types: Wanted, Inconsistent, Unwanted, or Coerced.

Results: Among women with a history of abortion (n=409), negative emotions were reported more intensely than relief. Relief was the predominant emotion only among the 29.8% of women whose abortions were freely wanted and consistent with their own values and preferences. For all other groups, relief was low and negative emotions were more prominent. Emotions following natural pregnancy losses were similar to those following abortion, but less severe following wanted abortions and more severe following coerced abortions.

Conclusions: Relief is only common after freely wanted abortions. Most abortions are inconsistent or contrary to women's own values. In these cases, strong negative emotions are far more dominant than relief. These results should inform pre-abortion screening, counseling supportive of women's own values and preferences, and mental health support post-abortion.

堕胎后最常见的反应是缓解吗?在全国41至45岁的女性样本中,因堕胎而自我评估的情绪强度。
背景:广泛报道堕胎后最突出的情绪是解脱。这一主张主要基于两项对堕胎诊所患者的研究,这些研究存在方法论和自我谴责偏见。其他研究表明,消极情绪比积极情绪更常见。本研究的目的是在一个随机的国家样本中获得关于堕胎和流产的情绪反应强度的自我评估数据。方法:采用视觉模拟量表,随机抽取1925名年龄在41岁至45岁之间的女性完成了一项调查,调查对象对她们第一次堕胎或自然流产时的情绪反应程度进行了评分。评估的情绪包括解脱、悲伤、抑郁、焦虑、内疚、空虚、愤怒、后悔、羞耻、不原谅自己、无法控制的哭泣、经常想起他们本可以生下的孩子,以及难以完成悲伤的过程。根据怀孕结果,女性被分为五组,以及四种堕胎决定类型:想要的、不一致的、不想要的和强迫的。结果:在有流产史的女性中(n=409),负面情绪比缓解情绪更强烈。只有29.8%的自愿堕胎且符合自己的价值观和偏好的妇女感到宽慰。对于所有其他组,缓解程度较低,负面情绪更为突出。自然流产后的情绪与流产后的情绪相似,但自愿流产后的情绪不那么严重,而强迫流产后的情绪更严重。结论:只有自愿堕胎后才会出现缓解。大多数堕胎都不符合或违背了妇女自己的价值观。在这些情况下,强烈的负面情绪远比解脱更重要。这些结果应该为堕胎前的筛查、支持妇女自身价值观和偏好的咨询以及堕胎后的心理健康支持提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信