Comparison of Four Ni-Ti Rotary Systems: Dental Students' Perceptions in a Multi-Center Simulated Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Francesco Puleio, Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Rosario Pirri, Angela Alibrandi, Daria Pulvirenti, Michele Simeone
{"title":"Comparison of Four Ni-Ti Rotary Systems: Dental Students' Perceptions in a Multi-Center Simulated Study.","authors":"Francesco Puleio, Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Rosario Pirri, Angela Alibrandi, Daria Pulvirenti, Michele Simeone","doi":"10.3390/dj13030097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments have significantly enhanced the efficiency and safety of root canal shaping. However, the variety of Ni-Ti systems, characterized by differences in alloy composition, taper design, and heat treatment, may influence their usability, particularly for novice operators. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of dental students using four Ni-Ti rotary systems (MTwo, SlimShaper Pro, ProTaper Gold, and HyFlex EDM) in a simulated environment. <b>Methods</b>: Forty dental students from two universities participated in the study and completed a standardized preoperative training session. Root canal shaping was performed on resin teeth models, and an 11-item questionnaire was used to assess various parameters, including flexibility, ease of use, and the ability to maintain working length. <b>Results</b>: The results indicated significant differences in student feedback. SlimShaper Pro and HyFlex EDM were preferred for their flexibility, reduced resistance, and ease of instrument transitions, likely due to their smaller tapers and martensitic alloys. MTwo was rated the least flexible and more challenging to use. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings underline the importance of user-friendly Ni-Ti systems in pre-clinical training to reduce procedural difficulties and operator stress. Further research should validate these findings in clinical settings to improve the training of novice operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13030097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary instruments have significantly enhanced the efficiency and safety of root canal shaping. However, the variety of Ni-Ti systems, characterized by differences in alloy composition, taper design, and heat treatment, may influence their usability, particularly for novice operators. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of dental students using four Ni-Ti rotary systems (MTwo, SlimShaper Pro, ProTaper Gold, and HyFlex EDM) in a simulated environment. Methods: Forty dental students from two universities participated in the study and completed a standardized preoperative training session. Root canal shaping was performed on resin teeth models, and an 11-item questionnaire was used to assess various parameters, including flexibility, ease of use, and the ability to maintain working length. Results: The results indicated significant differences in student feedback. SlimShaper Pro and HyFlex EDM were preferred for their flexibility, reduced resistance, and ease of instrument transitions, likely due to their smaller tapers and martensitic alloys. MTwo was rated the least flexible and more challenging to use. Conclusions: These findings underline the importance of user-friendly Ni-Ti systems in pre-clinical training to reduce procedural difficulties and operator stress. Further research should validate these findings in clinical settings to improve the training of novice operators.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信