Keiichiro Uchikura, Sufyan Garoushi, Kohji Nagata, Pekka K Vallittu, Noriyuki Wakabayashi, Lippo Lassila
{"title":"Load-Bearing Capacity of Incisors Restored Using Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post-Core Systems.","authors":"Keiichiro Uchikura, Sufyan Garoushi, Kohji Nagata, Pekka K Vallittu, Noriyuki Wakabayashi, Lippo Lassila","doi":"10.3390/dj13030125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to analyze the load-bearing performance of upper incisors and evaluate the curing of the luting polymer composite at various depths within the canal. <b>Methods:</b> A total of one hundred maxillary central incisors (10 groups, <i>n</i> = 10/group) were subjected to various restorative techniques. Approach A used Gradia Core for post-core and crown; Approach B employed prefabricated fiber posts (4 mm or 8 mm) with Gradia for luting and core build-up; Approach C used short-fiber composite (everX Flow) for post-core build-up; and Approach D used fiber posts with everX Flow for luting and core build-up. Restorations underwent cyclic fatigue (40,000 cycles at 95 N) and quasi-static fracture testing. Surface hardness of luting polymer composites was also measured. <b>Results:</b> Data showed that restorations with additional fiber posts (Approaches B and D) had significantly higher load-bearing capacity (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while post material and length had no significant impact (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Short-fiber composite as luting and core material (Approach D) enhanced load-bearing performance compared to Gradia-based restorations (Approach B, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of short-fiber composite as both the post luting and core material in restoring compromised incisors, along with a conventional fiber post, demonstrated favorable results in terms of load-bearing capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13030125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the load-bearing performance of upper incisors and evaluate the curing of the luting polymer composite at various depths within the canal. Methods: A total of one hundred maxillary central incisors (10 groups, n = 10/group) were subjected to various restorative techniques. Approach A used Gradia Core for post-core and crown; Approach B employed prefabricated fiber posts (4 mm or 8 mm) with Gradia for luting and core build-up; Approach C used short-fiber composite (everX Flow) for post-core build-up; and Approach D used fiber posts with everX Flow for luting and core build-up. Restorations underwent cyclic fatigue (40,000 cycles at 95 N) and quasi-static fracture testing. Surface hardness of luting polymer composites was also measured. Results: Data showed that restorations with additional fiber posts (Approaches B and D) had significantly higher load-bearing capacity (p < 0.05), while post material and length had no significant impact (p > 0.05). Short-fiber composite as luting and core material (Approach D) enhanced load-bearing performance compared to Gradia-based restorations (Approach B, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of short-fiber composite as both the post luting and core material in restoring compromised incisors, along with a conventional fiber post, demonstrated favorable results in terms of load-bearing capacity.