Predictive Value of Platelet FcγRIIa in Patients Treated With PCI Compared With Medical Therapy Alone After Myocardial Infarction.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
David J Schneider, Sean R McMahon, Dominick J Angiolillo, Alexander C Fanaroff, Homam Ibrahim, Patrick K Hohl, Brett L Wanamaker, Mark B Effron, Peter M DiBattiste
{"title":"Predictive Value of Platelet FcγRIIa in Patients Treated With PCI Compared With Medical Therapy Alone After Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"David J Schneider, Sean R McMahon, Dominick J Angiolillo, Alexander C Fanaroff, Homam Ibrahim, Patrick K Hohl, Brett L Wanamaker, Mark B Effron, Peter M DiBattiste","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with myocardial infarction (MI), quantifying platelet FcɣRIIa (pFCG) stratifies the risk of subsequent MI, stroke, and death. This report is a subgroup analysis of outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical management alone in an 800-patient, 25-center trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were enrolled in a prospective, noninterventional trial during hospitalization for type 1 MI (ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation). Inclusion criteria included at least 2 of the following: aged ≥65 years, multivessel coronary artery disease, prior MI, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes. Flow cytometry was used to quantify pFCG at a core laboratory. High and low pFCG were defined by a prespecified threshold. The primary end point was the composite of MI, stroke, and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with medical therapy alone (n=151) had a greater occurrence of the primary end point (23.8%) than those treated with PCI (n=490, 8.8%). The pFCG test discriminated to a similar extent the risk of the primary end point in both the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.18-4.41]; <i>P</i>=0.014) and the PCI group (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.41-4.69]; <i>P</i>=0.002). There was no significant association between pFCG and clinically relevant bleeding in the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.29-5.10]) or the PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.67-3.61]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quantifying pFCG discerned the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events among patients treated with medical therapy alone or PCI. This prognostic information will be useful for clinical decisions that balance ischemic and bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05175261.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014939"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014939","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with myocardial infarction (MI), quantifying platelet FcɣRIIa (pFCG) stratifies the risk of subsequent MI, stroke, and death. This report is a subgroup analysis of outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical management alone in an 800-patient, 25-center trial.

Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective, noninterventional trial during hospitalization for type 1 MI (ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation). Inclusion criteria included at least 2 of the following: aged ≥65 years, multivessel coronary artery disease, prior MI, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes. Flow cytometry was used to quantify pFCG at a core laboratory. High and low pFCG were defined by a prespecified threshold. The primary end point was the composite of MI, stroke, and death.

Results: Patients treated with medical therapy alone (n=151) had a greater occurrence of the primary end point (23.8%) than those treated with PCI (n=490, 8.8%). The pFCG test discriminated to a similar extent the risk of the primary end point in both the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.18-4.41]; P=0.014) and the PCI group (hazard ratio, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.41-4.69]; P=0.002). There was no significant association between pFCG and clinically relevant bleeding in the medical treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.29-5.10]) or the PCI group (hazard ratio, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.67-3.61]).

Conclusions: Quantifying pFCG discerned the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events among patients treated with medical therapy alone or PCI. This prognostic information will be useful for clinical decisions that balance ischemic and bleeding risk.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05175261.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信