Gabriele Schreiber, Facundo Rueda, Florian Renner, Asya Fatima Polat, Philipp Lorenz, Edda Klipp
{"title":"Expression Dynamics and Genetic Compensation of Cell Cycle Paralogues in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>.","authors":"Gabriele Schreiber, Facundo Rueda, Florian Renner, Asya Fatima Polat, Philipp Lorenz, Edda Klipp","doi":"10.3390/cells14060412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell cycle progression of the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a pair of paralogues, which are considered to have similar functions and periods of expression. Here, we use single molecule inexpensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (smiFISH) to measure the expression of five pairs of paralogous genes relevant for cell cycle progression (<i>CLN1</i>/<i>CLN2</i>, <i>CLB5</i>/<i>CLB6</i>, <i>CLB3</i>/<i>CLB4</i>, <i>CLB1</i>/<i>CLB2</i> and <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>) in a large number of unsynchronized single cells representing all cell cycle phases. We systematically compare their expression patterns and strengths. In addition, we also analyze the effect of the knockout of one part of each pair on the expression of the other gene. In order to classify cells into specific cell cycle phases, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN). We find that the expression levels of some cell-cycle related paralogues differ in their correlation, with <i>CLN1</i> and <i>CLN2</i> showing strong correlation and <i>CLB3</i> and <i>CLB4</i> showing weakest correlation. The temporal profiles of some pairs also differ. Upon deletion of their paralogue, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> seem to compensate for the expression of the other gene, while this was not observed for <i>ACE2</i>/<i>SWI5</i>. Interestingly, <i>CLB1</i> and <i>CLB2</i> also seem to share work between mother and bud in the G2 phase, where <i>CLB2</i> is primarily expressed in the bud and <i>CLB1</i> in the mother. Taken together, our results suggest that paralogues related to yeast cell cycle progression should not be considered as the same but differ both in their expression strength and timing as well in their precise role in cell cycle regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9743,"journal":{"name":"Cells","volume":"14 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cells","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14060412","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cell cycle progression of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is largely driven by the expression of cyclins, which in turn bind the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 providing specificity. Due to the duplication of the yeast genome during evolution, most of the cyclins are present as a pair of paralogues, which are considered to have similar functions and periods of expression. Here, we use single molecule inexpensive fluorescence in situ hybridization (smiFISH) to measure the expression of five pairs of paralogous genes relevant for cell cycle progression (CLN1/CLN2, CLB5/CLB6, CLB3/CLB4, CLB1/CLB2 and ACE2/SWI5) in a large number of unsynchronized single cells representing all cell cycle phases. We systematically compare their expression patterns and strengths. In addition, we also analyze the effect of the knockout of one part of each pair on the expression of the other gene. In order to classify cells into specific cell cycle phases, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN). We find that the expression levels of some cell-cycle related paralogues differ in their correlation, with CLN1 and CLN2 showing strong correlation and CLB3 and CLB4 showing weakest correlation. The temporal profiles of some pairs also differ. Upon deletion of their paralogue, CLB1 and CLB2 seem to compensate for the expression of the other gene, while this was not observed for ACE2/SWI5. Interestingly, CLB1 and CLB2 also seem to share work between mother and bud in the G2 phase, where CLB2 is primarily expressed in the bud and CLB1 in the mother. Taken together, our results suggest that paralogues related to yeast cell cycle progression should not be considered as the same but differ both in their expression strength and timing as well in their precise role in cell cycle regulation.
CellsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
3472
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍:
Cells (ISSN 2073-4409) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to cell biology, molecular biology and biophysics. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided.