Validation of a Novel Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Method for Assessing Intracoronary Flow: Combining Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xinzhou Xie, Na Li, Tiantong Yu, Wenjun Pu, Heqiang Lin, Xiang Li, Guoquan Li, Chengxiang Li, Yan Chen, Kun Lian
{"title":"Validation of a Novel Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Method for Assessing Intracoronary Flow: Combining Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve.","authors":"Xinzhou Xie, Na Li, Tiantong Yu, Wenjun Pu, Heqiang Lin, Xiang Li, Guoquan Li, Chengxiang Li, Yan Chen, Kun Lian","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a 3D model reconstructed from coronary angiography, intracoronary blood flow can be calculated using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured pressure as boundary conditions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical feasibility of this method by evaluating its ability to identify myocardial ischemia diagnosed by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent both SPECT-MPI and coronary angiography with FFR within 1 week were enrolled. Based on the summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) of SPECT MPI, myocardial ischemia in individual coronary territories was identified. Mean flow rate (Q), total flow resistance (TFR), absolute microvascular resistance (AMR) and their corresponding resting state indices were computed using the novel CFD model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients with 53 vessels were investigated. Based on SPECT MPI, 23 patients (43.4%) were associated with abnormal MPI. Q was significant higher in normal MPI group compared with abnormal MPI group (59.68 ± 40.33 mL/min vs. 25.67 ± 21.55 mL/min, p < 0.001). The TFR were significantly lower in normal MPI group (TFR: 1898.25 ± 951.55 mmHg min/L vs. 4786.31 ± 3056.18 mmHg min/L, p < 0.001). The ROC-AUC of Q and TFR for discriminating normal and abnormal MPI were 0.876 (95% CI: 0.783-0.970, p < 0.001) and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.745-0.963, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracoronary flow assessed by the novel CFD based method has shown promise in accurately identifying patients with abnormal SPECT MPI, offering a convenient and quantitative approach for assessing coronary physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With a 3D model reconstructed from coronary angiography, intracoronary blood flow can be calculated using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured pressure as boundary conditions.

Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical feasibility of this method by evaluating its ability to identify myocardial ischemia diagnosed by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

Methods: Patients who underwent both SPECT-MPI and coronary angiography with FFR within 1 week were enrolled. Based on the summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) of SPECT MPI, myocardial ischemia in individual coronary territories was identified. Mean flow rate (Q), total flow resistance (TFR), absolute microvascular resistance (AMR) and their corresponding resting state indices were computed using the novel CFD model.

Results: A total of 52 patients with 53 vessels were investigated. Based on SPECT MPI, 23 patients (43.4%) were associated with abnormal MPI. Q was significant higher in normal MPI group compared with abnormal MPI group (59.68 ± 40.33 mL/min vs. 25.67 ± 21.55 mL/min, p < 0.001). The TFR were significantly lower in normal MPI group (TFR: 1898.25 ± 951.55 mmHg min/L vs. 4786.31 ± 3056.18 mmHg min/L, p < 0.001). The ROC-AUC of Q and TFR for discriminating normal and abnormal MPI were 0.876 (95% CI: 0.783-0.970, p < 0.001) and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.745-0.963, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Intracoronary flow assessed by the novel CFD based method has shown promise in accurately identifying patients with abnormal SPECT MPI, offering a convenient and quantitative approach for assessing coronary physiology.

一种新的基于计算流体动力学的评估冠状动脉内血流的方法的验证:结合冠状动脉造影和分数血流储备。
背景:利用冠状动脉造影重建的三维模型,可以利用计算流体动力学(CFD)模型计算冠状动脉内血流,以分数血流储备(FFR)测量压力作为边界条件。目的:通过评价该方法对SPECT心肌灌注显像(MPI)诊断的心肌缺血的鉴别能力,探讨该方法的临床可行性。方法:纳入在1周内接受SPECT-MPI和冠状动脉造影合并FFR的患者。根据SPECT MPI的总应激评分(SSS)和总差异评分(SDS),确定单个冠状动脉区域的心肌缺血。利用该模型计算了平均流速(Q)、总流动阻力(TFR)、绝对微血管阻力(AMR)及其相应的静息状态指标。结果:共检查52例患者,53条血管。基于SPECT MPI, 23例(43.4%)患者伴有MPI异常。MPI正常组的Q值明显高于MPI异常组(59.68±40.33 mL/min vs. 25.67±21.55 mL/min)。结论:基于CFD的冠状动脉内血流评估方法能够准确识别SPECT MPI异常患者,为评估冠状动脉生理提供了一种方便、定量的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信