Standardizing Best Practices: An Initiative Utilizing Surgical Ward Round Checklists to Enhance Patient Safety and Documentation in Our Trust.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Antonio Bozzi, Heraa Islam, Valentin Butnari, Nunzia Morricone, Sonia Franchini, Dixon Osilli, Ahmer Mansuri, Francesco Di Nubila, Robert Leonides Buhain
{"title":"Standardizing Best Practices: An Initiative Utilizing Surgical Ward Round Checklists to Enhance Patient Safety and Documentation in Our Trust.","authors":"Antonio Bozzi, Heraa Islam, Valentin Butnari, Nunzia Morricone, Sonia Franchini, Dixon Osilli, Ahmer Mansuri, Francesco Di Nubila, Robert Leonides Buhain","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Comprehensive ward round documentation is crucial for ensuring effective communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have been shown to improve documentation quality in various healthcare settings. This article presents the findings of a comprehensive audit consisting of two cycles, which incorporate feedback, bring about implications, and evaluate the impact of a standardized proforma on inpatient ward round documentation for General Surgery patients in a high-volume surgical unit. <b>Methods</b> Initially, a staff survey was conducted to identify deficiencies in ward round documentation, highlighting the need for a standardized proforma. To establish a baseline, a retrospective review of 45 ward round entries assessed five key areas: diagnosis, disease management, objective assessments, discharge planning, and documentation logistics. Subsequently, within a month of implementing the changes, 20 ward round entries were analyzed based on the same criteria during a second cycle. <b>Results</b> During Cycle 1, we found that 95.6% of the notes lacked information on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, while nearly 88.9% were missing data on current issues, and 46.7% did not include pain scores. Additionally, we found that bowel function and fluid balance information were absent in 62.2% and 95.6% of ward round entries, respectively. Cycle 2 showed a significant improvement in terms of documentation for most of the items. Most of the variables were documented in all the reviewed proformas and others such as VTE prophylaxis and fluid balance showed a significant improvement being documented in 95% of the proformas. <b>Conclusion</b> Employing a standardized ward round proforma demonstrably improved documentation completeness across all safety parameters within our surgical unit. This enhanced focus on crucial safety discussions during ward rounds is expected to further elevate patient safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 3","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Comprehensive ward round documentation is crucial for ensuring effective communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have been shown to improve documentation quality in various healthcare settings. This article presents the findings of a comprehensive audit consisting of two cycles, which incorporate feedback, bring about implications, and evaluate the impact of a standardized proforma on inpatient ward round documentation for General Surgery patients in a high-volume surgical unit. Methods Initially, a staff survey was conducted to identify deficiencies in ward round documentation, highlighting the need for a standardized proforma. To establish a baseline, a retrospective review of 45 ward round entries assessed five key areas: diagnosis, disease management, objective assessments, discharge planning, and documentation logistics. Subsequently, within a month of implementing the changes, 20 ward round entries were analyzed based on the same criteria during a second cycle. Results During Cycle 1, we found that 95.6% of the notes lacked information on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, while nearly 88.9% were missing data on current issues, and 46.7% did not include pain scores. Additionally, we found that bowel function and fluid balance information were absent in 62.2% and 95.6% of ward round entries, respectively. Cycle 2 showed a significant improvement in terms of documentation for most of the items. Most of the variables were documented in all the reviewed proformas and others such as VTE prophylaxis and fluid balance showed a significant improvement being documented in 95% of the proformas. Conclusion Employing a standardized ward round proforma demonstrably improved documentation completeness across all safety parameters within our surgical unit. This enhanced focus on crucial safety discussions during ward rounds is expected to further elevate patient safety outcomes.

目的/背景 全面的查房记录对于确保有效沟通和患者安全至关重要。在各种医疗机构中,标准化核对表已被证明可提高记录质量。本文介绍了由两个周期组成的全面审核结果,其中包括反馈意见、带来的影响,以及评估标准化表格对一个高产量外科病房普通外科住院病人查房记录的影响。方法 首先,对员工进行调查,找出查房记录中的不足,强调标准化表格的必要性。为了建立基线,对 45 份查房记录进行了回顾性审查,评估了五个关键领域:诊断、疾病管理、客观评估、出院计划和文档记录。随后,在实施更改后的一个月内,我们根据相同的标准对 20 份查房记录进行了第二轮分析。结果 在第一周期中,我们发现 95.6% 的记录缺少静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防的信息,近 88.9% 的记录缺少当前问题的数据,46.7% 的记录不包括疼痛评分。此外,我们还发现分别有 62.2% 和 95.6% 的查房记录中缺少肠道功能和体液平衡信息。第二周期显示,大部分项目的记录情况有了明显改善。大多数变量在所有审查过的表格中都有记录,其他变量如 VTE 预防和体液平衡也有显著改善,在 95% 的表格中都有记录。结论 采用标准化查房表格明显改善了我们外科单元所有安全参数记录的完整性。在查房过程中加强对关键安全讨论的关注,有望进一步提高患者的安全结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信