{"title":"Role for MRI in Secondary Screening for Placenta Accreta.","authors":"Edward Golob, Kashif Burney, Tamal Datta, Sally Lewis, Jazmin Gajadhar, Ramesh Ganapathy","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Rates of both placenta praevia and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are rising. There is significant morbidity associated with PAS and antenatal detection reduces morbidity at delivery. In the UK there is a move to centralise care of these cases in dedicated units. Incidental diagnosis is more common, in the absence of a regular screening program. In non-specialist hospitals, there is a need to consider adjunct confirmatory diagnostics prior to referral to specialist centres. This is important to ensure capacity management in specialist centres. Ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have both been used to diagnose PAS with high levels of accuracy with experienced operators. The role of MRI as an adjunct with US has not been clearly defined but is often requested. <b>Methods</b> A retrospective analysis of all cases referred for MRI as a secondary modality after US to evaluate possible PAS. A total of 41 cases had MRI performed over 13 years with a trend of increasing demand over time. <b>Results</b> The series identified eleven cases of PAS. MRI demonstrated a high level of accuracy, similar to published literature (sensitivity 81.8%, Specificity 86.6%) and correctly reclassified 2 cases as PAS, which were considered normal on US. There were 2 cases of PAS which were missed by both US and MRI. <b>Conclusion</b> This series demonstrates increasing demand in our trust for MRI over the period of the study. The addition of MRI as a second test improved accuracy compared to ultrasound alone. MRI has a role in secondary screening for PAS in non-specialist units.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 3","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims/Background Rates of both placenta praevia and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) are rising. There is significant morbidity associated with PAS and antenatal detection reduces morbidity at delivery. In the UK there is a move to centralise care of these cases in dedicated units. Incidental diagnosis is more common, in the absence of a regular screening program. In non-specialist hospitals, there is a need to consider adjunct confirmatory diagnostics prior to referral to specialist centres. This is important to ensure capacity management in specialist centres. Ultrasound (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) have both been used to diagnose PAS with high levels of accuracy with experienced operators. The role of MRI as an adjunct with US has not been clearly defined but is often requested. Methods A retrospective analysis of all cases referred for MRI as a secondary modality after US to evaluate possible PAS. A total of 41 cases had MRI performed over 13 years with a trend of increasing demand over time. Results The series identified eleven cases of PAS. MRI demonstrated a high level of accuracy, similar to published literature (sensitivity 81.8%, Specificity 86.6%) and correctly reclassified 2 cases as PAS, which were considered normal on US. There were 2 cases of PAS which were missed by both US and MRI. Conclusion This series demonstrates increasing demand in our trust for MRI over the period of the study. The addition of MRI as a second test improved accuracy compared to ultrasound alone. MRI has a role in secondary screening for PAS in non-specialist units.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training.
The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career.
The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.