{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Social Prescribing for Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Deirdre Connolly, Chloe O'Hara, Catherine O'Brien, Adrienne Dempsey","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following cancer treatment, individuals experience a range of physical, mental and social health difficulties that interfere with their ability to resume participation in pre-cancer activities. In Ireland, the National Cancer Strategy recommends community-based services to address post-treatment difficulties. Social prescribing is a community-based, non-medical service that links individuals with health-related activities and supports in their community. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for cancer survivors. A mixed methods study was undertaken with individuals who had completed curative treatment for any cancer type. Recruitment was carried out in a national cancer centre. Quantitative outcomes included feasibility metrics (recruitment, intervention adherence and retention), the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS), the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), and EORTC QLQ-C30. Qualitative interviews explored acceptability of social prescribing. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data). Out of 131 individuals identified as eligible to participate, 43 agreed to participate (32.8% recruitment) and 27 met a link worker and were connected to a local activity (62.7% adherence) and completed follow-up outcome measures (62.7% retention). Improvements were observed in all health-related outcomes and those interviewed identified the intervention as acceptable. Study participants attended a range of community-based activities as a result of link worker support. They also reported increased confidence, improved mental health and reduction in fatigue following attendance at community-based activities. The findings of this study indicate that social prescribing is a feasible and acceptable community-based intervention to improve the physical, mental and social health of individuals living with and beyond cancer. A pilot randomised trial is indicated to inform a definitive intervention trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Following cancer treatment, individuals experience a range of physical, mental and social health difficulties that interfere with their ability to resume participation in pre-cancer activities. In Ireland, the National Cancer Strategy recommends community-based services to address post-treatment difficulties. Social prescribing is a community-based, non-medical service that links individuals with health-related activities and supports in their community. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for cancer survivors. A mixed methods study was undertaken with individuals who had completed curative treatment for any cancer type. Recruitment was carried out in a national cancer centre. Quantitative outcomes included feasibility metrics (recruitment, intervention adherence and retention), the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), the Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS), the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), and EORTC QLQ-C30. Qualitative interviews explored acceptability of social prescribing. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (quantitative data) and content analysis (qualitative data). Out of 131 individuals identified as eligible to participate, 43 agreed to participate (32.8% recruitment) and 27 met a link worker and were connected to a local activity (62.7% adherence) and completed follow-up outcome measures (62.7% retention). Improvements were observed in all health-related outcomes and those interviewed identified the intervention as acceptable. Study participants attended a range of community-based activities as a result of link worker support. They also reported increased confidence, improved mental health and reduction in fatigue following attendance at community-based activities. The findings of this study indicate that social prescribing is a feasible and acceptable community-based intervention to improve the physical, mental and social health of individuals living with and beyond cancer. A pilot randomised trial is indicated to inform a definitive intervention trial.
期刊介绍:
Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease.
We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.