Enhancing CAR-T Efficacy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Radiation Bridging Therapy: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Eva Laverdure, Luigina Mollica, Imran Ahmad, Sandra Cohen, Silvy Lachance, Olivier Veilleux, Maryse Bernard, Eve-Lyne Marchand, Jean-Sébastien Delisle, Lea Bernard, Mélissa Boileau, Tony Petrella, Sarah-Jeanne Pilon, Philippe Bouchard, Denis-Claude Roy, Lambert Busque, Isabelle Fleury
{"title":"Enhancing CAR-T Efficacy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Radiation Bridging Therapy: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Eva Laverdure, Luigina Mollica, Imran Ahmad, Sandra Cohen, Silvy Lachance, Olivier Veilleux, Maryse Bernard, Eve-Lyne Marchand, Jean-Sébastien Delisle, Lea Bernard, Mélissa Boileau, Tony Petrella, Sarah-Jeanne Pilon, Philippe Bouchard, Denis-Claude Roy, Lambert Busque, Isabelle Fleury","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32030173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One challenge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is achieving disease control during manufacturing. We report real-word outcomes of 100 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, <i>n</i> = 50) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, <i>n</i> = 50) at our center. Most patients received bridging therapy (BT) with 48 undergoing radiation BT (RBT) and 32 receiving systemic BT (SBT). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (78% complete response (CR)) for axi-cel and 60% (42% CR) for tisa-cel. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 72% and 82% for axi-cel, compared to 35% and 57% for tisa-cel. By the bridging approach, 12-month PFS was 60% with RBT, 59% without BT and 35% with SBT (<i>p</i> = 0.06). Notably, axi-cel patients without lymphoma progression during manufacturing (<i>n</i> = 24) achieved 12-month PFS and OS rates of 91% and 96%, respectively. Axi-cel was associated with more cytokine release syndrome (92% vs. 66%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and neurotoxicity (all-grade 56% vs. 10%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, grade ≥ 328% vs. 4%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified RBT as independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Pending prospective validation, RBT shows promise for improving CAR-T outcomes in LBCL.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32030173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One challenge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is achieving disease control during manufacturing. We report real-word outcomes of 100 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, n = 50) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, n = 50) at our center. Most patients received bridging therapy (BT) with 48 undergoing radiation BT (RBT) and 32 receiving systemic BT (SBT). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (78% complete response (CR)) for axi-cel and 60% (42% CR) for tisa-cel. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 72% and 82% for axi-cel, compared to 35% and 57% for tisa-cel. By the bridging approach, 12-month PFS was 60% with RBT, 59% without BT and 35% with SBT (p = 0.06). Notably, axi-cel patients without lymphoma progression during manufacturing (n = 24) achieved 12-month PFS and OS rates of 91% and 96%, respectively. Axi-cel was associated with more cytokine release syndrome (92% vs. 66%, p = 0.003) and neurotoxicity (all-grade 56% vs. 10%, p < 0.001, grade ≥ 328% vs. 4%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified RBT as independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Pending prospective validation, RBT shows promise for improving CAR-T outcomes in LBCL.

放疗桥接疗法提高CAR-T治疗大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效:真实世界的单中心经验。
嵌合抗原受体t细胞疗法(CAR-T)治疗复发或难治性大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)的一个挑战是在制造过程中实现疾病控制。我们报告了在我们中心接受axicabtagene ciloleucel(轴细胞,n = 50)或tisagenlecleucel(组织细胞,n = 50)治疗的100例患者的实际结果。大多数患者接受桥接治疗(BT),其中48例接受放射性BT (RBT), 32例接受全身BT (SBT)。轴细胞的最佳总缓解率(ORR)为84%(78%完全缓解(CR)),组织细胞为60% (42% CR)。在中位随访16个月时,轴细胞的12个月无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为72%和82%,而组织细胞为35%和57%。通过桥接方法,RBT组12个月的PFS为60%,无BT组为59%,SBT组为35% (p = 0.06)。值得注意的是,在制造过程中没有淋巴瘤进展的轴细胞患者(n = 24)分别获得了91%和96%的12个月PFS和OS率。axis -cel与更多的细胞因子释放综合征(92%对66%,p = 0.003)和神经毒性(所有级别56%对10%,p < 0.001,级别≥328%对4%,p = 0.002)相关。多变量分析发现RBT与PFS的改善独立相关(HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96)。在前瞻性验证之前,RBT有望改善LBCL的CAR-T治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信