Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for particle sizing: A notorious challenge.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Jan-Hagen Krohn, Adam Mamot, Nastasja Kaletta, Yusuf Qutbuddin, Petra Schwille
{"title":"Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for particle sizing: A notorious challenge.","authors":"Jan-Hagen Krohn, Adam Mamot, Nastasja Kaletta, Yusuf Qutbuddin, Petra Schwille","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many quantitative investigations of biological systems, including, e.g., the study of biomolecular interactions, assembly and disassembly, aggregation, micelle and vesicle formation, or drug encapsulation, accurate determination of particle sizes is of key interest. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), with its exceptional sensitivity for molecular diffusion properties, has long been proposed as a valuable method to size small, freely diffusible particles with superior precision. It is conceptually related to the more widespread particle sizing technique dynamic light scattering (DLS) but offers greater selectivity and sensitivity due to the use of fluorescence rather than scattered light. However, in spite of these apparent advantages, FCS has never become established as a biophysical routine for particle sizing. This is due to the fact that sensitivity can, under certain conditions, indeed be disadvantageous, as it renders the technique error prone and overly susceptible to signal disturbances. Here, we discuss the systematic challenges, as well as the advances made over the past decades, to employing FCS in polydisperse samples. The problematic role of large particles, a common issue in DLS and FCS, and the effect of fluorescent labeling are discussed in detail, along with strategies for respective error mitigation in experiments and data analysis. We expect this overview to guide future users in successfully applying FCS to their particle sizing problems in the hope of fostering a more widespread and routine use of FCS-based technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In many quantitative investigations of biological systems, including, e.g., the study of biomolecular interactions, assembly and disassembly, aggregation, micelle and vesicle formation, or drug encapsulation, accurate determination of particle sizes is of key interest. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), with its exceptional sensitivity for molecular diffusion properties, has long been proposed as a valuable method to size small, freely diffusible particles with superior precision. It is conceptually related to the more widespread particle sizing technique dynamic light scattering (DLS) but offers greater selectivity and sensitivity due to the use of fluorescence rather than scattered light. However, in spite of these apparent advantages, FCS has never become established as a biophysical routine for particle sizing. This is due to the fact that sensitivity can, under certain conditions, indeed be disadvantageous, as it renders the technique error prone and overly susceptible to signal disturbances. Here, we discuss the systematic challenges, as well as the advances made over the past decades, to employing FCS in polydisperse samples. The problematic role of large particles, a common issue in DLS and FCS, and the effect of fluorescent labeling are discussed in detail, along with strategies for respective error mitigation in experiments and data analysis. We expect this overview to guide future users in successfully applying FCS to their particle sizing problems in the hope of fostering a more widespread and routine use of FCS-based technology.

荧光相关光谱学用于颗粒大小:一个臭名昭著的挑战。
在生物系统的许多定量研究中,包括生物分子相互作用、组装和分解、聚集、胶束和囊泡形成或药物封装的研究,精确测定颗粒大小是关键所在。荧光相关光谱法(FCS)对分子扩散特性异常敏感,长期以来一直被认为是精确测定可自由扩散的小颗粒大小的重要方法。从概念上讲,它与更为普遍的颗粒测定技术动态光散射(DLS)有关,但由于使用的是荧光而不是散射光,因此具有更高的选择性和灵敏度。然而,尽管有这些明显的优势,FCS 却从未成为颗粒测定的生物物理常规方法。这是因为在某些条件下,灵敏度确实会带来不利影响,因为它使该技术容易出错,而且过于容易受到信号干扰的影响。在此,我们将讨论在多分散样品中使用 FCS 所面临的系统性挑战,以及在过去几十年中取得的进展。我们详细讨论了大颗粒的问题(这是 DLS 和 FCS 中的常见问题)以及荧光标记的影响,同时还讨论了在实验和数据分析中减少各自误差的策略。我们希望本综述能指导未来的用户成功地将 FCS 应用于他们的颗粒测定问题,从而促进基于 FCS 技术的更广泛和常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信