High-Potency Cannabis Use and Health: A Systematic Review of Observational and Experimental Studies.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Stephanie Lake, Conor H Murray, Brittany Henry, Liza Strong, Kendall White, Beau Kilmer, Ziva D Cooper
{"title":"High-Potency Cannabis Use and Health: A Systematic Review of Observational and Experimental Studies.","authors":"Stephanie Lake, Conor H Murray, Brittany Henry, Liza Strong, Kendall White, Beau Kilmer, Ziva D Cooper","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20240269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amid continuously rising concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in cannabis (i.e., potency), high-potency cannabis is a major topic in contemporary cannabis policy discussions, yet its impact on health is not well understood. The authors conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between high-potency cannabis use and a range of health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records were obtained from a systematic search of five biomedical research databases. The authors developed ecologically relevant potency (percent THC) exposure-comparison categories (1%-9%, 10%-19%, 20%-30%, kief/resin [∼30%-50%], concentrates [≥60%]) and used a landmark scientific report on cannabis and cannabinoids to determine outcome eligibility. Two reviewers independently conducted article screening and selection, extraction, and quality assessment. Findings were synthesized using both quantitative (association direction, binomial test) and narrative approaches. Certainty in the evidence was determined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,545 screened records, 42 were eligible. Most studies addressed outcomes in the mental health, \"problem\" cannabis use, and other substance use domains. Findings in the \"problem\" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with higher-potency cannabis use. Findings were less consistent in other domains but tended to favor poorer outcomes with higher-potency use. Therapeutic outcomes were limited and mixed. Overall, certainty in the evidence was \"very low.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings within the \"problem\" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with high-potency use. Research is largely limited to cross-sectional studies spanning few adverse health domains, underscoring the need for prospective studies probing therapeutic, cardiorespiratory, cancer, and pre- and perinatal outcomes. Policies to curb high-potency cannabis use may be warranted while the evidence base improves.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"appiajp20240269"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20240269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Amid continuously rising concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in cannabis (i.e., potency), high-potency cannabis is a major topic in contemporary cannabis policy discussions, yet its impact on health is not well understood. The authors conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies examining the relationship between high-potency cannabis use and a range of health outcomes.

Methods: Records were obtained from a systematic search of five biomedical research databases. The authors developed ecologically relevant potency (percent THC) exposure-comparison categories (1%-9%, 10%-19%, 20%-30%, kief/resin [∼30%-50%], concentrates [≥60%]) and used a landmark scientific report on cannabis and cannabinoids to determine outcome eligibility. Two reviewers independently conducted article screening and selection, extraction, and quality assessment. Findings were synthesized using both quantitative (association direction, binomial test) and narrative approaches. Certainty in the evidence was determined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

Results: Of 4,545 screened records, 42 were eligible. Most studies addressed outcomes in the mental health, "problem" cannabis use, and other substance use domains. Findings in the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with higher-potency cannabis use. Findings were less consistent in other domains but tended to favor poorer outcomes with higher-potency use. Therapeutic outcomes were limited and mixed. Overall, certainty in the evidence was "very low."

Conclusions: Findings within the "problem" cannabis use domain were suggestive of an association with high-potency use. Research is largely limited to cross-sectional studies spanning few adverse health domains, underscoring the need for prospective studies probing therapeutic, cardiorespiratory, cancer, and pre- and perinatal outcomes. Policies to curb high-potency cannabis use may be warranted while the evidence base improves.

高效大麻的使用和健康:观察和实验研究的系统回顾。
目的:由于大麻中的δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)浓度(即效力)不断上升,高效力大麻是当代大麻政策讨论中的一个主要议题,但人们对其对健康的影响还不甚了解。作者对研究高浓度大麻使用与一系列健康结果之间关系的观察性和实验性研究进行了系统回顾:方法:通过对五个生物医学研究数据库的系统搜索获得了相关记录。作者制定了与生态相关的效力(四氢大麻酚百分比)暴露比较类别(1%-9%、10%-19%、20%-30%、松香/树脂[∼30%-50%]、浓缩物[≥60%]),并使用关于大麻和大麻素的里程碑式科学报告来确定结果的合格性。两名审稿人独立进行文章筛选、提取和质量评估。研究结果采用定量(关联方向、二项式检验)和叙述两种方法进行综合。通过建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架确定证据的确定性:在筛选出的 4545 份记录中,有 42 份符合条件。大多数研究涉及心理健康、"问题 "大麻使用和其他药物使用领域的结果。问题 "大麻使用领域的研究结果表明与高效力大麻使用有关。其他领域的研究结果不那么一致,但倾向于使用高浓度大麻的结果较差。治疗效果有限,且好坏参半。总体而言,证据的确定性 "非常低":"问题 "大麻使用领域的研究结果表明与高浓度使用有关。研究主要局限于横断面研究,涉及的不利健康领域很少,这突出表明有必要开展前瞻性研究,探究治疗、心肺功能、癌症以及产前和围产期结果。在证据基础得到改善的同时,可能有必要制定遏制高浓度大麻使用的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信