Correction of Gynecomastia with Combination of Ultrasonic Liposuction (VASER) and Gland Excision through a Minimal Scar Incision: A Multi-Center Experience.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hasan Ali
{"title":"Correction of Gynecomastia with Combination of Ultrasonic Liposuction (VASER) and Gland Excision through a Minimal Scar Incision: A Multi-Center Experience.","authors":"Hasan Ali","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04801-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecomastia is a common condition among men, leading to psychological distress and impacting quality of life. Traditional correction techniques often result in prominent scarring, which can be a major concern for patients. This study explores the efficacy of combining VASER liposuction with gland excision through a minimal scar approach to improve aesthetic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed 960 patients treated between October 2009 and January 2024 at two centers located in Dubai and Riyadh. Patients were classified using Simon's grading system. The surgical procedure included VASER-assisted liposuction targeting the chest, lateral chest, and axillary fold areas, followed by gland excision through a minimal scar incision. Satisfaction was assessed using both patient- and physician-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Ethical approval was obtained from the Dubai Scientific and Research Ethics Committee (DSREC) and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hasan Surgery and The Clinics Riyadh KSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient distribution by Simon grading was: Grade I (16.7%), Grade IIA (41.7%), Grade IIB (29.2%), and Grade III (12.5%). Mean aspirated fat volume was 859.4 ml. Patient satisfaction was high, with a mean VAS score of 9.4 across all grades, and minor complications such as bruising, temporary sensory loss, and hematomas occurred in 1.7% of cases. Physician-assessed VAS scores mirrored patient satisfaction, demonstrating the reliability of the technique in achieving minimal scarring, significant skin retraction, improved contouring, and high satisfaction rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining VASER-assisted liposuction with gland excision through a minimal scar incision is a highly effective approach for gynecomastia correction. The technique delivers superior aesthetic outcomes, minimal scarring, and high satisfaction across all grades of gynecomastia. Further long-term studies are recommended to assess delayed recurrence.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence v: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04801-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gynecomastia is a common condition among men, leading to psychological distress and impacting quality of life. Traditional correction techniques often result in prominent scarring, which can be a major concern for patients. This study explores the efficacy of combining VASER liposuction with gland excision through a minimal scar approach to improve aesthetic outcomes.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 960 patients treated between October 2009 and January 2024 at two centers located in Dubai and Riyadh. Patients were classified using Simon's grading system. The surgical procedure included VASER-assisted liposuction targeting the chest, lateral chest, and axillary fold areas, followed by gland excision through a minimal scar incision. Satisfaction was assessed using both patient- and physician-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores. Ethical approval was obtained from the Dubai Scientific and Research Ethics Committee (DSREC) and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hasan Surgery and The Clinics Riyadh KSA.

Results: Patient distribution by Simon grading was: Grade I (16.7%), Grade IIA (41.7%), Grade IIB (29.2%), and Grade III (12.5%). Mean aspirated fat volume was 859.4 ml. Patient satisfaction was high, with a mean VAS score of 9.4 across all grades, and minor complications such as bruising, temporary sensory loss, and hematomas occurred in 1.7% of cases. Physician-assessed VAS scores mirrored patient satisfaction, demonstrating the reliability of the technique in achieving minimal scarring, significant skin retraction, improved contouring, and high satisfaction rates.

Conclusion: Combining VASER-assisted liposuction with gland excision through a minimal scar incision is a highly effective approach for gynecomastia correction. The technique delivers superior aesthetic outcomes, minimal scarring, and high satisfaction across all grades of gynecomastia. Further long-term studies are recommended to assess delayed recurrence.

Level of evidence v: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

背景:妇科炎症是男性的常见病,会导致心理困扰并影响生活质量。传统的矫正技术通常会造成明显的疤痕,这可能是患者最担心的问题。本研究探讨了通过最小疤痕方法将 VASER 吸脂术与腺体切除术相结合以改善美学效果的有效性:本研究回顾性分析了 2009 年 10 月至 2024 年 1 月期间在迪拜和利雅得两家中心接受治疗的 960 名患者。采用西蒙分级系统对患者进行分类。手术方法包括针对胸部、侧胸部和腋窝部位的 VASER 辅助吸脂术,然后通过最小疤痕切口进行腺体切除。满意度采用患者和医生报告的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行评估。该研究获得了迪拜科学研究伦理委员会(DSREC)和沙特阿拉伯利雅得哈桑外科和诊所机构审查委员会(IRB)的伦理批准:西蒙分级的患者分布情况如下I级(16.7%)、IIA级(41.7%)、IIB级(29.2%)和III级(12.5%)。平均抽吸脂肪量为 859.4 毫升。患者的满意度很高,所有等级的平均 VAS 评分均为 9.4 分,1.7% 的病例出现了瘀伤、暂时性感觉缺失和血肿等轻微并发症。医生评估的 VAS 评分与患者的满意度相吻合,表明该技术在实现疤痕最小化、皮肤显著回缩、轮廓改善和高满意度方面的可靠性:结论:通过最小疤痕切口将 VASER 辅助吸脂术与腺体切除术相结合是一种非常有效的妇科整形方法。结论:将 VASER 辅助吸脂术与腺体切除术通过最小疤痕切口结合起来,是一种非常有效的妇科整形方法。建议进一步开展长期研究,以评估延迟复发情况:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知 www.springer.com/00266 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信