Barriers to Clinical Academic Surgical Training and Career Development in the United Kingdom: A Review from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) Group.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-26 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0419
Vassili Crispi, William Bolton, Manish Chand, Stefano Giuliani, Victoria Wykes, Ryan K Mathew
{"title":"Barriers to Clinical Academic Surgical Training and Career Development in the United Kingdom: A Review from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) Group.","authors":"Vassili Crispi, William Bolton, Manish Chand, Stefano Giuliani, Victoria Wykes, Ryan K Mathew","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical academics play a vital role in advancing medical research, knowledge and treatments within the National Health System (NHS), but this career's sustainability is at risk due to barriers to accessing and pursuing research opportunities throughout a surgeon's training and career. Despite the diversification of surgical training with integrated opportunities, challenges such as limited training opportunities, lack of protected research time, and financial constraints persist. This paper from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) group highlights these issues, addressing the competitiveness of academic pathways, workload balance, mentorship importance, and the need for standardised assessments. It highlights the need for greater accountability from healthcare employers and academic institutions. Additionally, the paper focuses on increasing diversity and inclusion in clinical academia, addressing systemic discrimination, and changing the NHS culture. This paper calls for collective efforts from the medical profession, government, and institutions to address these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 3","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical academics play a vital role in advancing medical research, knowledge and treatments within the National Health System (NHS), but this career's sustainability is at risk due to barriers to accessing and pursuing research opportunities throughout a surgeon's training and career. Despite the diversification of surgical training with integrated opportunities, challenges such as limited training opportunities, lack of protected research time, and financial constraints persist. This paper from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Advanced Surgical Technology Incubator (ASTI) group highlights these issues, addressing the competitiveness of academic pathways, workload balance, mentorship importance, and the need for standardised assessments. It highlights the need for greater accountability from healthcare employers and academic institutions. Additionally, the paper focuses on increasing diversity and inclusion in clinical academia, addressing systemic discrimination, and changing the NHS culture. This paper calls for collective efforts from the medical profession, government, and institutions to address these issues.

英国临床学术外科培训和职业发展的障碍:来自国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)先进外科技术孵化器(ASTI)小组的综述。
临床学者在推进国家卫生系统(NHS)内的医学研究、知识和治疗方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但由于外科医生在整个培训和职业生涯中获取和追求研究机会的障碍,这一职业的可持续性面临风险。尽管外科培训的多样化和整合的机会,挑战,如有限的培训机会,缺乏保护的研究时间,和财政限制仍然存在。这篇来自美国国立卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)先进外科技术孵化器(ASTI)小组的论文强调了这些问题,解决了学术途径的竞争力、工作量平衡、指导的重要性以及标准化评估的必要性。它强调了医疗保健雇主和学术机构需要更大的问责制。此外,本文着重于增加临床学术界的多样性和包容性,解决系统性歧视,并改变NHS文化。本文呼吁医学界、政府和机构共同努力解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信