Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the core lower urinary tract symptom score in multiple sclerosis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Humeyra Kiloatar, Aylin Aydogdu Delibay, Cimen Olçay Demir, Dursun Ceylan, Niyazi Uysal
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the core lower urinary tract symptom score in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Humeyra Kiloatar, Aylin Aydogdu Delibay, Cimen Olçay Demir, Dursun Ceylan, Niyazi Uysal","doi":"10.1007/s13760-025-02769-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In multiple sclerosis, lower urinary tract symptoms are frequently observed depending on the site of involvement. A comprehensive assessment of these symptoms is crucial for their effective management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research was designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Scale (CLSS) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>71 PwMS who had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 6.5 or below was included. Data collection involved demographic information as well as responses to the CLSS, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index, Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index, and International Prostate Symptom Score. To evaluate test-retest reliability, the CLSS was administered again under identical conditions after a 7-day interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.79. Test-retest reliability for the CLSS sub-items ranged from 0.593 to 0.950. No statistically significant differences were found between the sub-items scores of the test and retest administrations. (p > 0.05). Moreover, the subscales showed significant correlations with the other questionnaires, with correlation coefficients varying between 0.109 and 0.770. Straining, feeling incomplete emptying, and pain in the bladder sub-items did not show a significant correlation with the corresponding sub-items of other questionnaires (r = 0.109, 0.270, and 0.195, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish adaptation of the CLSS questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms in PwMS.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>Gov Number: NCT06599866.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02769-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In multiple sclerosis, lower urinary tract symptoms are frequently observed depending on the site of involvement. A comprehensive assessment of these symptoms is crucial for their effective management.

Objective: This research was designed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish adaptation of the Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Scale (CLSS) in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Methods: 71 PwMS who had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 6.5 or below was included. Data collection involved demographic information as well as responses to the CLSS, Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index, Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index, and International Prostate Symptom Score. To evaluate test-retest reliability, the CLSS was administered again under identical conditions after a 7-day interval.

Results: The internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.79. Test-retest reliability for the CLSS sub-items ranged from 0.593 to 0.950. No statistically significant differences were found between the sub-items scores of the test and retest administrations. (p > 0.05). Moreover, the subscales showed significant correlations with the other questionnaires, with correlation coefficients varying between 0.109 and 0.770. Straining, feeling incomplete emptying, and pain in the bladder sub-items did not show a significant correlation with the corresponding sub-items of other questionnaires (r = 0.109, 0.270, and 0.195, respectively).

Conclusion: The Turkish adaptation of the CLSS questionnaire has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms in PwMS.

Clinicaltrials: Gov Number: NCT06599866.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信