Overall Survival With Palbociclib and Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitor Alone in Older Patients With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70719
Adam M. Brufsky, Rickard Sandin, Stella Stergiopoulos, Connie Chen, Siddharth Karanth, Benjamin Li, Elizabeth Esterberg, Doris Makari, Sean D. Candrilli, Ravi K. Goyal, Hope S. Rugo
{"title":"Overall Survival With Palbociclib and Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitor Alone in Older Patients With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer","authors":"Adam M. Brufsky,&nbsp;Rickard Sandin,&nbsp;Stella Stergiopoulos,&nbsp;Connie Chen,&nbsp;Siddharth Karanth,&nbsp;Benjamin Li,&nbsp;Elizabeth Esterberg,&nbsp;Doris Makari,&nbsp;Sean D. Candrilli,&nbsp;Ravi K. Goyal,&nbsp;Hope S. Rugo","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy are the current standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). To investigate the effectiveness of palbociclib, the first-in-class CDK4/6i, plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in older patients, we compared overall survival (OS) in a Medicare population treated with 1L palbociclib + AI versus an AI alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients aged ≥ 65 years who were diagnosed with de novo HR+/HER2– mBC from 2015 to 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–linked Medicare database and were eligible if they initiated 1L palbociclib + AI or an AI alone. The primary endpoint was OS. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 779 eligible patients, 296 received palbociclib + AI and 483 received AI alone as 1L treatment. After sIPTW, the median follow-up was 23.1 months with palbociclib + AI and 18.2 months with AI alone. Adjusted median OS was longer with palbociclib + AI versus AI alone (sIPTW: 37.6 vs. 25.5 months, HR = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59–0.91]). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, patients treated with palbociclib + AI versus AI alone had a 39% lower risk of death (HR = 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48–0.77]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In routine US clinical practice, palbociclib + AI was associated with significantly prolonged OS versus AI alone in 1L treatment of patients aged ≥ 65 years with de novo HR+/HER2– mBC, adding to the growing body of evidence on the survival benefit of palbociclib + AI in this patient population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06086340</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70719","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with endocrine therapy are the current standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). To investigate the effectiveness of palbociclib, the first-in-class CDK4/6i, plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in older patients, we compared overall survival (OS) in a Medicare population treated with 1L palbociclib + AI versus an AI alone.

Methods

Patients aged ≥ 65 years who were diagnosed with de novo HR+/HER2– mBC from 2015 to 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–linked Medicare database and were eligible if they initiated 1L palbociclib + AI or an AI alone. The primary endpoint was OS. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) was used to balance baseline patient characteristics.

Results

Of 779 eligible patients, 296 received palbociclib + AI and 483 received AI alone as 1L treatment. After sIPTW, the median follow-up was 23.1 months with palbociclib + AI and 18.2 months with AI alone. Adjusted median OS was longer with palbociclib + AI versus AI alone (sIPTW: 37.6 vs. 25.5 months, HR = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59–0.91]). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, patients treated with palbociclib + AI versus AI alone had a 39% lower risk of death (HR = 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48–0.77]).

Conclusion

In routine US clinical practice, palbociclib + AI was associated with significantly prolonged OS versus AI alone in 1L treatment of patients aged ≥ 65 years with de novo HR+/HER2– mBC, adding to the growing body of evidence on the survival benefit of palbociclib + AI in this patient population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06086340

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信