Integrating Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jingjing Liu, Zhangdaihong Liu, Chang Liu, Hong Sun, Xiaoguang Li, Yang Yang
{"title":"Integrating Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review","authors":"Jingjing Liu,&nbsp;Zhangdaihong Liu,&nbsp;Chang Liu,&nbsp;Hong Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoguang Li,&nbsp;Yang Yang","doi":"10.1002/dmrr.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a progressive chronic pathophysiological state characterised by abdominal obesity, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and dyslipidaemia. It is recognised as one of the major clinical syndromes affecting human health, with approximately one-quarter of the global population impacted. MetS increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and diverse metabolic diseases. Early diagnosis of MetS could potentially reduce the prevalence of these diseases. However, care for the MetS population faces significant challenges due to (i) a lack of comprehensive understanding of the full spectrum of associated diseases, stemming from unclear pathophysiological mechanisms and (ii) frequent underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis of MetS in clinical settings due to inconsistent screening guidelines, limited medical resources, time constraints in clinical practice, and insufficient awareness and training. The increasing availability of healthcare and medical data presents opportunities to apply and innovate with artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing these challenges. This review aims to (i) summarise the spectrum of diseases associated with MetS and (ii) review the diverse AI models applied to MetS and metabolic syndrome-related diseases (MetSRD), where MetSRD collectively refers to diseases and conditions directly associated with MetS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our review consists of two phases. Initially, we conducted a literature review on MetS to narrow down the spectrum of MetSRD based on the strength of clinical evidence. We then used the terms ‘Metabolic Syndrome’ and ‘Machine Learning’ in combination with the identified MetSRD for further refinement. In total, we identified 52 related diseases in the first phase and 36 articles in the second phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified a total of 52 MetSRD after the first phase, with T2DM, CVDs, and cancer being the top three. Among the 36 articles obtained in the second phase, we observed the following: (i) The criteria for MetS were inconsistent across the studies. (ii) The primary purpose of AI applications was to identify risk factors for diseases, thereby improving predictions for MetS or MetSRD. Traditional machine learning models, such as Random Forest and Logistic Regression, were found to be the most effective. (iii) In addition to the MetS criteria, AI models explored other factors, including demographic and physiological variables, dietary influences, lipidomic and proteomic indicators, and more.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This review underscores the significant link between MetS and a spectrum of diseases, with a particular focus on underreported conditions such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and stroke. Through the analysis of data from diverse sources, AI models, and MetS diagnostic criteria, additional indicators beyond traditional measures have been identified, emphasising the importance of combining both traditional and non-traditional markers to enhance the diagnostic and predictive capabilities for MetS and MetSRD. AI shows great potential in MetS research, particularly through the integration of multi-source data, including clinical metrics, genetic information, and omics data. The amalgamation of traditional machine learning and modern machine learning models is particularly promising, offering a balanced approach to model performance and data complexity. While international definitions provide global applicability, they may not be suitable for all populations and scenarios, necessitating flexible diagnostic criteria and adaptive, explainable algorithms. Ultimately, these will enable personalised diagnostics and targeted interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11335,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dmrr.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dmrr.70039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a progressive chronic pathophysiological state characterised by abdominal obesity, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and dyslipidaemia. It is recognised as one of the major clinical syndromes affecting human health, with approximately one-quarter of the global population impacted. MetS increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and diverse metabolic diseases. Early diagnosis of MetS could potentially reduce the prevalence of these diseases. However, care for the MetS population faces significant challenges due to (i) a lack of comprehensive understanding of the full spectrum of associated diseases, stemming from unclear pathophysiological mechanisms and (ii) frequent underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis of MetS in clinical settings due to inconsistent screening guidelines, limited medical resources, time constraints in clinical practice, and insufficient awareness and training. The increasing availability of healthcare and medical data presents opportunities to apply and innovate with artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing these challenges. This review aims to (i) summarise the spectrum of diseases associated with MetS and (ii) review the diverse AI models applied to MetS and metabolic syndrome-related diseases (MetSRD), where MetSRD collectively refers to diseases and conditions directly associated with MetS.

Methods

Our review consists of two phases. Initially, we conducted a literature review on MetS to narrow down the spectrum of MetSRD based on the strength of clinical evidence. We then used the terms ‘Metabolic Syndrome’ and ‘Machine Learning’ in combination with the identified MetSRD for further refinement. In total, we identified 52 related diseases in the first phase and 36 articles in the second phase.

Results

We identified a total of 52 MetSRD after the first phase, with T2DM, CVDs, and cancer being the top three. Among the 36 articles obtained in the second phase, we observed the following: (i) The criteria for MetS were inconsistent across the studies. (ii) The primary purpose of AI applications was to identify risk factors for diseases, thereby improving predictions for MetS or MetSRD. Traditional machine learning models, such as Random Forest and Logistic Regression, were found to be the most effective. (iii) In addition to the MetS criteria, AI models explored other factors, including demographic and physiological variables, dietary influences, lipidomic and proteomic indicators, and more.

Conclusion

This review underscores the significant link between MetS and a spectrum of diseases, with a particular focus on underreported conditions such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and stroke. Through the analysis of data from diverse sources, AI models, and MetS diagnostic criteria, additional indicators beyond traditional measures have been identified, emphasising the importance of combining both traditional and non-traditional markers to enhance the diagnostic and predictive capabilities for MetS and MetSRD. AI shows great potential in MetS research, particularly through the integration of multi-source data, including clinical metrics, genetic information, and omics data. The amalgamation of traditional machine learning and modern machine learning models is particularly promising, offering a balanced approach to model performance and data complexity. While international definitions provide global applicability, they may not be suitable for all populations and scenarios, necessitating flexible diagnostic criteria and adaptive, explainable algorithms. Ultimately, these will enable personalised diagnostics and targeted interventions.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews is a premier endocrinology and metabolism journal esteemed by clinicians and researchers alike. Encompassing a wide spectrum of topics including diabetes, endocrinology, metabolism, and obesity, the journal eagerly accepts submissions ranging from clinical studies to basic and translational research, as well as reviews exploring historical progress, controversial issues, and prominent opinions in the field. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the realm of diabetes and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信