Tam-Lin Chow FRCS(Edin), FHKAM(Surgery), Peter S. M. Yu FRCR, FHKCR, FHKAM(Radiology)
{"title":"Prolonged exposure of implantable central venous access device salvaged by a simple local flap: A case report","authors":"Tam-Lin Chow FRCS(Edin), FHKAM(Surgery), Peter S. M. Yu FRCR, FHKCR, FHKAM(Radiology)","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>An implantable central venous device is often used in patients when prolonged intravenous systemic therapy is anticipated for oncologic treatment. Exposure of a percutaneous implantable venous access device is a known complication that usually requires its removal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We report a patient with a venous device implanted in the left arm, which was complicated by device exposure for 4 months. Clinically, there was no evidence of infection. The issue was addressed with a simple local flap for coverage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A local random fasciocutaneous flap was elevated under local anaesthesia and transferred to cover the exposed device as a day surgery. The wound healed uneventfully, with no recurrence of device exposure at the 3-month follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The reported case supports flap coverage as an effective method for addressing exposed implantable venous devices, even with prolonged exposure, provided there is no infection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"29 1","pages":"53-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
An implantable central venous device is often used in patients when prolonged intravenous systemic therapy is anticipated for oncologic treatment. Exposure of a percutaneous implantable venous access device is a known complication that usually requires its removal.
Methods
We report a patient with a venous device implanted in the left arm, which was complicated by device exposure for 4 months. Clinically, there was no evidence of infection. The issue was addressed with a simple local flap for coverage.
Results
A local random fasciocutaneous flap was elevated under local anaesthesia and transferred to cover the exposed device as a day surgery. The wound healed uneventfully, with no recurrence of device exposure at the 3-month follow-up.
Conclusion
The reported case supports flap coverage as an effective method for addressing exposed implantable venous devices, even with prolonged exposure, provided there is no infection.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.