Gareth Jenkins, Eric S. Boyd, Antoine Danchin, Vincent Hervé
{"title":"Microbiome Notes—Building a Library of Descriptive Microbial Ecology","authors":"Gareth Jenkins, Eric S. Boyd, Antoine Danchin, Vincent Hervé","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Environmental Microbiology Reports</i> (EMIR), along with its sister journal <i>Environmental Microbiology</i> (EMI), seek to publish research that advances knowledge on microorganisms, their function, and their interactions with the environment. The key differentiator from its sister journal, however, is that EMIR does not aim to let the subjective opinions of either editors or reviewers influence a decision on whether to publish based on the potential impact or novelty of that work. Instead, EMIR forms assessments purely based on the rigour of the methodology and the robustness of the results—an assessment of the importance of any conclusions or inferences is left to the readers.</p><p>This approach lets EMIR take a flexible view on what ‘should’ or ‘should not’ be published and aims to work with authors to ensure valuable work is as widely read as possible. Crucially, this means EMIR can address gaps in what is published and disseminated without making a call on whether it will impact journal metrics. Impact comes in many forms. Editors at EMIR look at what authors want to publish and position the journal as a venue to help them get that work noticed and widely disseminated.</p><p>With that in mind, we are launching a new article type in EMIR—<b><i>Microbiome Notes</i></b>. At both EMI and EMIR, there has been a significant increase in the number of submissions received that focus solely on microbiomes (which here we define as an examination of the microbial community present in a precisely defined environment). These papers are not necessarily hypothesis-driven but rather are descriptive and seek to enhance the body of literature around a particular taxon or environment type. Such work is consistent with a longstanding philosophy at EMIR to publish ‘short and direct science’ (Ramos <span>2009</span>). We recognise that such descriptive papers can have tremendous value to the field; building a library of microbiome work can inform and enhance more far-reaching research by providing significantly greater context to organismal and community biodiversity.</p><p>Authors of descriptive microbiome work that is submitted to EMI will be encouraged to transfer their work to EMIR, consistent with the differing but complementary approaches taken at the two journals (refer author guidelines at both titles), and assessed purely on the rigour of the methodology and the robustness of the results. While not required, authors are encouraged to include as much contextual data associated with the studied microbiome, and these data need to be well-curated, machine readable and following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) principles (Hertz and McNeill <span>2024</span>). If the editors believe that the microbial and, where appropriate, contextual data reported are sound and are an advancement in the field, the journal will consider it.</p><p>Additionally, recognising that descriptive work is often hard to align with rigid article formatting requirements, the journal will not take a position on article structure. Authors should feel free to present their microbiome studies in the best way they see fit. However, they must be consistent with journal data archiving and availability standards, i.e., data, metadata and code must be supplied at submission, and should comply with minimum standards (Jenkins et al. <span>2023</span>). The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC: DDBJ/Genbank/ENA-EBI) is our recommended repository for sequence data, but ultimately it is up to the author as long as the chosen archive is transparent in the way it is financially supported, in the way it handles data, with a clear data structure, open and issues a permanent identifier (DOI).</p><p><b>Gareth Jenkins:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. <b>Eric S. Boyd:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Antoine Danchin:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Vincent Hervé:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-2229.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental Microbiology Reports (EMIR), along with its sister journal Environmental Microbiology (EMI), seek to publish research that advances knowledge on microorganisms, their function, and their interactions with the environment. The key differentiator from its sister journal, however, is that EMIR does not aim to let the subjective opinions of either editors or reviewers influence a decision on whether to publish based on the potential impact or novelty of that work. Instead, EMIR forms assessments purely based on the rigour of the methodology and the robustness of the results—an assessment of the importance of any conclusions or inferences is left to the readers.
This approach lets EMIR take a flexible view on what ‘should’ or ‘should not’ be published and aims to work with authors to ensure valuable work is as widely read as possible. Crucially, this means EMIR can address gaps in what is published and disseminated without making a call on whether it will impact journal metrics. Impact comes in many forms. Editors at EMIR look at what authors want to publish and position the journal as a venue to help them get that work noticed and widely disseminated.
With that in mind, we are launching a new article type in EMIR—Microbiome Notes. At both EMI and EMIR, there has been a significant increase in the number of submissions received that focus solely on microbiomes (which here we define as an examination of the microbial community present in a precisely defined environment). These papers are not necessarily hypothesis-driven but rather are descriptive and seek to enhance the body of literature around a particular taxon or environment type. Such work is consistent with a longstanding philosophy at EMIR to publish ‘short and direct science’ (Ramos 2009). We recognise that such descriptive papers can have tremendous value to the field; building a library of microbiome work can inform and enhance more far-reaching research by providing significantly greater context to organismal and community biodiversity.
Authors of descriptive microbiome work that is submitted to EMI will be encouraged to transfer their work to EMIR, consistent with the differing but complementary approaches taken at the two journals (refer author guidelines at both titles), and assessed purely on the rigour of the methodology and the robustness of the results. While not required, authors are encouraged to include as much contextual data associated with the studied microbiome, and these data need to be well-curated, machine readable and following FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) principles (Hertz and McNeill 2024). If the editors believe that the microbial and, where appropriate, contextual data reported are sound and are an advancement in the field, the journal will consider it.
Additionally, recognising that descriptive work is often hard to align with rigid article formatting requirements, the journal will not take a position on article structure. Authors should feel free to present their microbiome studies in the best way they see fit. However, they must be consistent with journal data archiving and availability standards, i.e., data, metadata and code must be supplied at submission, and should comply with minimum standards (Jenkins et al. 2023). The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC: DDBJ/Genbank/ENA-EBI) is our recommended repository for sequence data, but ultimately it is up to the author as long as the chosen archive is transparent in the way it is financially supported, in the way it handles data, with a clear data structure, open and issues a permanent identifier (DOI).
Gareth Jenkins: conceptualization, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft. Eric S. Boyd: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Antoine Danchin: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Vincent Hervé: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.
期刊介绍:
The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side.
Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities
microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes
microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors
microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution
population biology and clonal structure
microbial metabolic and structural diversity
microbial physiology, growth and survival
microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling
responses to environmental signals and stress factors
modelling and theory development
pollution microbiology
extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats
element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production
microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes
evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses
new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.