Comparison of Radial Artery Compression Techniques in Contemporary Cardiovascular Practice: The RAVE Trial

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Muddasir Ashraf, Suhail Q. Allaqaband, Louis Kostopoulos, Babak Haddadian, Tanvir Bajwa, Tonga Nfor, Jayant Khitha, Khawaja Afzal Ammar, Ahmad Khraisat, Robert Richmond, Sara Walczak, Wendy Dunaj, Viviana Zlochiver, Kritika Garg, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, Kirsten Tunink, Theresa Briggs, Jane Meitler, Michelle Bennett, M. Fuad Jan
{"title":"Comparison of Radial Artery Compression Techniques in Contemporary Cardiovascular Practice: The RAVE Trial","authors":"Muddasir Ashraf,&nbsp;Suhail Q. Allaqaband,&nbsp;Louis Kostopoulos,&nbsp;Babak Haddadian,&nbsp;Tanvir Bajwa,&nbsp;Tonga Nfor,&nbsp;Jayant Khitha,&nbsp;Khawaja Afzal Ammar,&nbsp;Ahmad Khraisat,&nbsp;Robert Richmond,&nbsp;Sara Walczak,&nbsp;Wendy Dunaj,&nbsp;Viviana Zlochiver,&nbsp;Kritika Garg,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Perez Moreno,&nbsp;Kirsten Tunink,&nbsp;Theresa Briggs,&nbsp;Jane Meitler,&nbsp;Michelle Bennett,&nbsp;M. Fuad Jan","doi":"10.1155/joic/1447277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The shorter time to hemostasis in patients who undergo transradial cardiac catheterization may reduce the complications, cause less pain, facilitate early discharge, and improve patient satisfaction.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> This trial aimed to evaluate if SoftSeal-STF (Chitogen Inc., Plymouth, MN) with manual compression alone or in combination with a radial compression device (RCD) would reduce time to hemostasis compared to patients with RCD only (Vasc Band).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> We enrolled 300 patients in four arms, including SoftSeal-STF with manual compression, Vasc Band (standard of care), SoftSeal-STF with TR Band, and SoftSeal-STF with EasyClik. This study was analyzed as an observational study due to modification in the design of a randomized trial. The primary outcome was time to hemostasis; the secondary outcomes were complications before discharge, a 3 day follow-up, and a follow-up office visit (30–45 days postprocedure).</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The median time to hemostasis (interquartile range [IQR]) was significantly lower in the SoftSeal-STF + TR Band group and the SoftSeal-STF + EasyClik group than in the Vasc Band group (45 [40–69] minutes vs. 120 [120–124] minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; 44 [40–58.5] minutes vs. 120 [120–124] minutes, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001, respectively). The median time to hemostasis (IQR) was not different between SoftSeal-STF + TR Band and SoftSeal-STF + EasyClik (45 [40–69] minutes vs. 44 [40–58.5] minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.3). The median time to hemostasis (IQR) was lowest in the SoftSeal-STF + manual compression group (19 [15–30] minutes), but these patients had more postoperative pain and bruising along with logistic issues within the catheterization lab.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The SoftSeal-STF + RCD is a safe and time-efficient strategy in patients who undergo transradial cardiac catheterization. (Radial Artery Vascular Complication and Resource Utilization [RAVE]).</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522077</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/1447277","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/joic/1447277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The shorter time to hemostasis in patients who undergo transradial cardiac catheterization may reduce the complications, cause less pain, facilitate early discharge, and improve patient satisfaction.

Objective: This trial aimed to evaluate if SoftSeal-STF (Chitogen Inc., Plymouth, MN) with manual compression alone or in combination with a radial compression device (RCD) would reduce time to hemostasis compared to patients with RCD only (Vasc Band).

Methods: We enrolled 300 patients in four arms, including SoftSeal-STF with manual compression, Vasc Band (standard of care), SoftSeal-STF with TR Band, and SoftSeal-STF with EasyClik. This study was analyzed as an observational study due to modification in the design of a randomized trial. The primary outcome was time to hemostasis; the secondary outcomes were complications before discharge, a 3 day follow-up, and a follow-up office visit (30–45 days postprocedure).

Results: The median time to hemostasis (interquartile range [IQR]) was significantly lower in the SoftSeal-STF + TR Band group and the SoftSeal-STF + EasyClik group than in the Vasc Band group (45 [40–69] minutes vs. 120 [120–124] minutes, p < 0.0001; 44 [40–58.5] minutes vs. 120 [120–124] minutes, p < 0.0001, respectively). The median time to hemostasis (IQR) was not different between SoftSeal-STF + TR Band and SoftSeal-STF + EasyClik (45 [40–69] minutes vs. 44 [40–58.5] minutes, p = 0.3). The median time to hemostasis (IQR) was lowest in the SoftSeal-STF + manual compression group (19 [15–30] minutes), but these patients had more postoperative pain and bruising along with logistic issues within the catheterization lab.

Conclusion: The SoftSeal-STF + RCD is a safe and time-efficient strategy in patients who undergo transradial cardiac catheterization. (Radial Artery Vascular Complication and Resource Utilization [RAVE]).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522077

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信