Physical Inactivity Among Pregnant Women at High Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Xiao Yang, Yingli Song, Yan Wang, Ji Zhang, Hui Huang, Jing Zhang, Rongrong Han, Zhixuan Xiang, Lu Chen, Lingling Gao
{"title":"Physical Inactivity Among Pregnant Women at High Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Xiao Yang,&nbsp;Yingli Song,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Ji Zhang,&nbsp;Hui Huang,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Rongrong Han,&nbsp;Zhixuan Xiang,&nbsp;Lu Chen,&nbsp;Lingling Gao","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study was implemented in Zhengzhou, China from October 2021 to February 2022. Two hundred fifty-two pregnant women at high risk for GDM were recruited. Physical inactivity was assessed by the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. The Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge of Physical Activity Questionnaire, Social Support for Physical Activity Scale, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and sociodemographic and antenatal characteristics questionnaire were collected and used to predict physical inactivity. Binary logistic regression was applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of physical inactivity was 53.2%. The risk factors for physical inactivity included low level of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13–32.31), middle levels of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45–18.20), no pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18–8.0), low pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.8), nulliparity (aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74–13.75), having a junior college degree or below (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10–3.74) and husbands having no habits of regular physical activity (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06–4.04).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed that physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for GDM was a public health concern in mainland China. Physical activity self-efficacy and pregnancy physical activity goals may be used to develop interventions to enhance physical activity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To examine the prevalence and predictors of physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was implemented in Zhengzhou, China from October 2021 to February 2022. Two hundred fifty-two pregnant women at high risk for GDM were recruited. Physical inactivity was assessed by the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. The Pregnancy Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale, Knowledge of Physical Activity Questionnaire, Social Support for Physical Activity Scale, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and sociodemographic and antenatal characteristics questionnaire were collected and used to predict physical inactivity. Binary logistic regression was applied. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

The prevalence of physical inactivity was 53.2%. The risk factors for physical inactivity included low level of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13–32.31), middle levels of physical activity self-efficacy (aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45–18.20), no pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18–8.0), low pregnancy physical activity goals (aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02–6.8), nulliparity (aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74–13.75), having a junior college degree or below (aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10–3.74) and husbands having no habits of regular physical activity (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06–4.04).

Conclusion

This study revealed that physical inactivity among pregnant women at high risk for GDM was a public health concern in mainland China. Physical activity self-efficacy and pregnancy physical activity goals may be used to develop interventions to enhance physical activity.

缺乏运动的妊娠期糖尿病高危孕妇:一项横断面研究
目的探讨中国大陆妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)高危孕妇缺乏运动的患病率及预测因素。方法于2021年10月至2022年2月在中国郑州实施横断面研究。研究招募了252名GDM高危孕妇。通过妊娠身体活动问卷对缺乏身体活动进行评估。收集《孕期体育活动自我效能感量表》、《体育活动知识量表》、《体育活动社会支持量表》、《7项广发性焦虑障碍量表》、《爱丁堡产后抑郁量表》和《社会人口学及产前特征问卷》对缺乏体育活动进行预测。采用二元逻辑回归。计算校正优势比和95%置信区间(ci)。结果缺乏身体活动的患病率为53.2%。缺乏身体活动的危险因素包括:低水平的身体活动自我效能(aOR: 6.05, 95% CI: 1.13-32.31)、中等水平的身体活动自我效能(aOR: 5.13, 95% CI: 1.45-18.20)、无孕期身体活动目标(aOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.18-8.0)、低水平的孕期身体活动目标(aOR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.02-6.8)、未生育(aOR: 7.17, 95% CI: 3.74-13.75)、大专及以下学历(aOR: 2.03, 95% CI: 3.03)。1.10-3.74)和丈夫没有规律体育活动习惯(aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.06-4.04)。结论GDM高危孕妇缺乏运动是中国大陆的一个公共卫生问题。体育活动自我效能感和孕期体育活动目标可用于制定干预措施,以加强体育活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信