Comparative study on phytochemical extraction from passion fruit wastes using ultrasound and supercritical fluid extraction

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kakali Borah, Rupesh Kumar, Sukumar Purohit, Vaibhav V. Goud
{"title":"Comparative study on phytochemical extraction from passion fruit wastes using ultrasound and supercritical fluid extraction","authors":"Kakali Borah,&nbsp;Rupesh Kumar,&nbsp;Sukumar Purohit,&nbsp;Vaibhav V. Goud","doi":"10.1007/s11694-025-03150-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The agricultural and food industries produce many byproducts that are rich in natural antioxidants with potential health benefits. This study aims to extract bioactive compounds from the yellow passion fruit rind (YPFR), with therapeutic properties like antibacterial, anticancer, and antioxidant activity. In this study, phytochemical extraction was performed using supercritical fluid extraction with CO<sub>2</sub> and 10% ethanol as co-solvent (SC-ET), and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with 65% ethanol. Both methods were compared for extraction yield, phytocomponents, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity. Phytochemical analysis showed significant phenolic, flavonoid, and carotenoid contents in extracts, contributing to its increased antioxidant activities. SC-ET exhibited higher flavonoid and carotenoid concentrations, however, UAE yielded higher phenolics. These support higher antioxidant capacity in SC-ET compared to the UAE during the Global Antioxidant Score (GAS). GC-MS identified 75 compounds in UAE extracts and 47 in SC-ET extracts, whilst HPLC profiling indicated higher phenolic and flavonoid contents in SC-ET extracts, demonstrating SFE’s selectivity and UAE’s broader compound extraction range. Both extracts showed significant antibacterial activity, with SC-ET being more potent. These findings revealed the potential of using passion fruit peel to extract bioactive compounds for the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries, promoting sustainable waste management and resource recovery.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","volume":"19 4","pages":"2831 - 2843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11694-025-03150-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-025-03150-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The agricultural and food industries produce many byproducts that are rich in natural antioxidants with potential health benefits. This study aims to extract bioactive compounds from the yellow passion fruit rind (YPFR), with therapeutic properties like antibacterial, anticancer, and antioxidant activity. In this study, phytochemical extraction was performed using supercritical fluid extraction with CO2 and 10% ethanol as co-solvent (SC-ET), and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) with 65% ethanol. Both methods were compared for extraction yield, phytocomponents, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity. Phytochemical analysis showed significant phenolic, flavonoid, and carotenoid contents in extracts, contributing to its increased antioxidant activities. SC-ET exhibited higher flavonoid and carotenoid concentrations, however, UAE yielded higher phenolics. These support higher antioxidant capacity in SC-ET compared to the UAE during the Global Antioxidant Score (GAS). GC-MS identified 75 compounds in UAE extracts and 47 in SC-ET extracts, whilst HPLC profiling indicated higher phenolic and flavonoid contents in SC-ET extracts, demonstrating SFE’s selectivity and UAE’s broader compound extraction range. Both extracts showed significant antibacterial activity, with SC-ET being more potent. These findings revealed the potential of using passion fruit peel to extract bioactive compounds for the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries, promoting sustainable waste management and resource recovery.

Graphical abstract

超声波与超临界流体萃取法提取百香果废弃物的比较研究
农业和食品工业生产的许多副产品富含天然抗氧化剂,对健康有潜在的好处。本研究旨在从西番莲黄果皮(YPFR)中提取具有抗菌、抗癌、抗氧化等治疗作用的活性化合物。在本研究中,采用超临界流体萃取,以CO2和10%乙醇为助溶剂(SC-ET),超声辅助萃取(UAE), 65%乙醇。比较了两种方法的提取率、植物成分、抗氧化和抗菌活性。植物化学分析表明,提取物中酚类、类黄酮和类胡萝卜素含量显著增加,有助于提高抗氧化活性。SC-ET表现出更高的类黄酮和类胡萝卜素浓度,然而,阿联酋产生更高的酚类物质。与全球抗氧化评分(GAS)相比,SC-ET的抗氧化能力更高。GC-MS鉴定了UAE提取物中的75种化合物和SC-ET提取物中的47种化合物,HPLC分析表明SC-ET提取物中酚类和类黄酮含量较高,证明了SFE的选择性和UAE更广泛的化合物提取范围。两种提取物均表现出显著的抗菌活性,其中SC-ET的抗菌活性更强。这些发现揭示了利用百香果皮提取食品、制药和化妆品行业的生物活性化合物,促进可持续废物管理和资源回收的潜力。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
425
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes new measurement results, characteristic properties, differentiating patterns, measurement methods and procedures for such purposes as food process innovation, product development, quality control, and safety assurance. The journal encompasses all topics related to food property measurement and characterization, including all types of measured properties of food and food materials, features and patterns, measurement principles and techniques, development and evaluation of technologies, novel uses and applications, and industrial implementation of systems and procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信