Optimal Design of BOG Reliquefaction Systems for LNG Carriers: A Focus on GMS Performance During Loaded Voyages

IF 2.9 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hyunjun Shin, Dongchan Kim, Wonjae Choi, Jong Min Lee
{"title":"Optimal Design of BOG Reliquefaction Systems for LNG Carriers: A Focus on GMS Performance During Loaded Voyages","authors":"Hyunjun Shin,&nbsp;Dongchan Kim,&nbsp;Wonjae Choi,&nbsp;Jong Min Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11814-024-00348-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study proposes a strategy for evaluating efficient design of the Gas Management System (GMS) on LNG carriers by decomposing its performance to subsystems: the reliquefaction system (RS) and the fuel gas supply system (FS). With increasingly stringent maritime regulations on greenhouse gas emissions, the need for efficient LNG carrier operations has become critical. A major factor in reducing fuel consumptions and carbon emissions is optimizing the design of the RS, given its significant power demand for processing NBOG. However, effective GMS design must account for variations in RS operation performance, as well as the contributions of the FS in treating NBOG with changes in ship speed. This study compares GSM configurations with reliquefaction systems based on two representative refrigeration cycles: the nitrogen reverse Brayton cycle (NRBC) and the single mixed refrigerant cycle (SMRC), both analyzing effects of cold BOG utilization. Results indicate that the RS of GMS4A-aSMRC [the aSMRC is the refrigeration cycle which utilizes cold BOG within the Single Mixed Refrigerant Cycle (SMRC)] demonstrates superior RS design performance. However, the most efficient GMS configuration varies with the Boil-off Rate (BOR): GMS2-aNRBC [the aNRBC is the refrigeration cycle which utilizes cold BOG within the Nitrogen Reverse Brayton Cycle (NRBC)] is optimal aligning with its RS performance for a 0.11%/day BOR, while GMS3-SMRC without cold BOG in RS is the most efficient for a 0.075%/day BOR, owing to increased contributions from the FS. In this study, a performance index with a consistently comparable baseline is derived to accommodate compositional deviations from flash gas recirculation at NBOG disposal streams, enabling the GMS performance to be correlated with compatible values of its decomposed subsystem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":684,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"42 4","pages":"901 - 921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11814-024-00348-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-024-00348-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a strategy for evaluating efficient design of the Gas Management System (GMS) on LNG carriers by decomposing its performance to subsystems: the reliquefaction system (RS) and the fuel gas supply system (FS). With increasingly stringent maritime regulations on greenhouse gas emissions, the need for efficient LNG carrier operations has become critical. A major factor in reducing fuel consumptions and carbon emissions is optimizing the design of the RS, given its significant power demand for processing NBOG. However, effective GMS design must account for variations in RS operation performance, as well as the contributions of the FS in treating NBOG with changes in ship speed. This study compares GSM configurations with reliquefaction systems based on two representative refrigeration cycles: the nitrogen reverse Brayton cycle (NRBC) and the single mixed refrigerant cycle (SMRC), both analyzing effects of cold BOG utilization. Results indicate that the RS of GMS4A-aSMRC [the aSMRC is the refrigeration cycle which utilizes cold BOG within the Single Mixed Refrigerant Cycle (SMRC)] demonstrates superior RS design performance. However, the most efficient GMS configuration varies with the Boil-off Rate (BOR): GMS2-aNRBC [the aNRBC is the refrigeration cycle which utilizes cold BOG within the Nitrogen Reverse Brayton Cycle (NRBC)] is optimal aligning with its RS performance for a 0.11%/day BOR, while GMS3-SMRC without cold BOG in RS is the most efficient for a 0.075%/day BOR, owing to increased contributions from the FS. In this study, a performance index with a consistently comparable baseline is derived to accommodate compositional deviations from flash gas recirculation at NBOG disposal streams, enabling the GMS performance to be correlated with compatible values of its decomposed subsystem.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
310
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering provides a global forum for the dissemination of research in chemical engineering. The Journal publishes significant research results obtained in the Asia-Pacific region, and simultaneously introduces recent technical progress made in other areas of the world to this region. Submitted research papers must be of potential industrial significance and specifically concerned with chemical engineering. The editors will give preference to papers having a clearly stated practical scope and applicability in the areas of chemical engineering, and to those where new theoretical concepts are supported by new experimental details. The Journal also regularly publishes featured reviews on emerging and industrially important subjects of chemical engineering as well as selected papers presented at international conferences on the subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信