Optimizing fatty acid composition in cookie formulation using vegetable oil blends: impacts on dough rheology, physical properties, and sensory qualities

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Veeranna Hitlamani, T. M. Hemraj, Aashithosh A. Inamdar
{"title":"Optimizing fatty acid composition in cookie formulation using vegetable oil blends: impacts on dough rheology, physical properties, and sensory qualities","authors":"Veeranna Hitlamani,&nbsp;T. M. Hemraj,&nbsp;Aashithosh A. Inamdar","doi":"10.1007/s11694-025-03124-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the replacement of bakery fat (BF) with various vegetable oil blends into cookies, with a focus on balancing the fatty acid composition to meet the WHO’s recommended ratio of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) at 1:1.5:1. 80% of Rice bran oil (RBO) was blended with 20% each of soybean (SBO), sunflower (SFO), coconut (CO), and groundnut oils (GNO), replacing the traditional BF. Cookies were evaluated based on their physical, sensory, and thermal properties. Proximate values, including moisture, fat, ash, and protein, showed no significant differences between oil-blended and control cookies. Cookie thickness was consistent across samples (11.8 mm to 12 mm), though a reduction in the spread ratio was noted with oil blends. Cookie hardness varied significantly, with the control having 67.35 N and the highest values observed in the RBO: SBO (90.15 N) and RBO: GNO (85.675 N) blends. Doughs prepared with oil blends exhibited higher hardness and gumminess, indicating firmer textures. DSC analysis demonstrated that different oil blends of dough affected fat crystallization and melting behavior in oil blend cookie dough. Among the blends, RBO: GNO had the closest ratio (1:1.6:1.2) to the recommended fatty acid proportions, while RBO: SBO also matched the ideal ratio. FTIR analysis confirmed the functional properties of the cookies, indicating healthier formulations without compromising sensory qualities. Hence, replacing traditional BFs with RBO-based oil blends improved fatty acid profiles while maintaining cookie quality along with an added neutra incentive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","volume":"19 4","pages":"2461 - 2475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11694-025-03124-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the replacement of bakery fat (BF) with various vegetable oil blends into cookies, with a focus on balancing the fatty acid composition to meet the WHO’s recommended ratio of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) at 1:1.5:1. 80% of Rice bran oil (RBO) was blended with 20% each of soybean (SBO), sunflower (SFO), coconut (CO), and groundnut oils (GNO), replacing the traditional BF. Cookies were evaluated based on their physical, sensory, and thermal properties. Proximate values, including moisture, fat, ash, and protein, showed no significant differences between oil-blended and control cookies. Cookie thickness was consistent across samples (11.8 mm to 12 mm), though a reduction in the spread ratio was noted with oil blends. Cookie hardness varied significantly, with the control having 67.35 N and the highest values observed in the RBO: SBO (90.15 N) and RBO: GNO (85.675 N) blends. Doughs prepared with oil blends exhibited higher hardness and gumminess, indicating firmer textures. DSC analysis demonstrated that different oil blends of dough affected fat crystallization and melting behavior in oil blend cookie dough. Among the blends, RBO: GNO had the closest ratio (1:1.6:1.2) to the recommended fatty acid proportions, while RBO: SBO also matched the ideal ratio. FTIR analysis confirmed the functional properties of the cookies, indicating healthier formulations without compromising sensory qualities. Hence, replacing traditional BFs with RBO-based oil blends improved fatty acid profiles while maintaining cookie quality along with an added neutra incentive.

使用植物油混合物优化曲奇配方中的脂肪酸组成:对面团流变学、物理性质和感官品质的影响
本研究探讨了用各种植物油混合物代替烘焙脂肪(BF)制成饼干,重点是平衡脂肪酸组成,以满足世界卫生组织推荐的1:1.5:1的饱和脂肪酸(SFA)、单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)和多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)的比例。以80%的米糠油(RBO)与各20%的大豆油(SBO)、葵花籽油(SFO)、椰子油(CO)和花生油(GNO)混合,取代传统的BF。饼干是根据它们的物理、感官和热性能来评估的。包括水分、脂肪、灰分和蛋白质在内的近似值在油混合饼干和对照饼干之间没有显着差异。饼干的厚度在不同的样品中是一致的(11.8毫米到12毫米),尽管在油混合物中发现了分布比的减少。甜饼硬度变化显著,对照组为67.35 N, RBO: SBO和RBO: GNO的混合硬度最高,分别为90.15 N和85.675 N。混合油制备的面团具有更高的硬度和粘性,表明质地更牢固。DSC分析表明,不同的混合油对混合油曲奇面团中脂肪的结晶和熔化行为有影响。其中,RBO: GNO最接近脂肪酸推荐比例(1:1. 16:1.2),RBO: SBO也最接近理想比例。FTIR分析证实了饼干的功能特性,表明更健康的配方,而不影响感官质量。因此,用基于rbo的油混合物取代传统的BFs可以改善脂肪酸分布,同时保持饼干的质量以及增加的中性激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
425
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes new measurement results, characteristic properties, differentiating patterns, measurement methods and procedures for such purposes as food process innovation, product development, quality control, and safety assurance. The journal encompasses all topics related to food property measurement and characterization, including all types of measured properties of food and food materials, features and patterns, measurement principles and techniques, development and evaluation of technologies, novel uses and applications, and industrial implementation of systems and procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信