A State-Matching-Based Method for Identifying Intrusive Object Data and Evaluating Collision Features Using Robotic E-Skin Proximity Perception

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Guangming Xue;Guodong Chen;Lining Sun;Huicong Liu
{"title":"A State-Matching-Based Method for Identifying Intrusive Object Data and Evaluating Collision Features Using Robotic E-Skin Proximity Perception","authors":"Guangming Xue;Guodong Chen;Lining Sun;Huicong Liu","doi":"10.1109/TIM.2025.3551000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proximity perception is a crucial foundation for robotic collision safety control, and e-skin proximity offers unique advantages in this field. However, traditional e-skin proximity data struggle to effectively distinguish between intrusive object data and the data from the robot itself and the surrounding environment, making it accurately evaluate collision features of intrusive objects. This article proposes a state-matching-based method for identifying intrusive object data and evaluating collision features using e-skin proximity. By establishing a nonintrusive feature model, the process extracts the nonintrusive feature data corresponding to the current robot state through state matching and compares it with the current e-skin proximity data. This allows for the effective identification of intrusive object data and the accurate and rapid evaluation of collision features, such as approach distance (AD) and approach orientation (AO). In the static experiments, the proposed method significantly improves the accuracy of evaluating AD and AO. In the dynamic experiments, the method proposed in this article demonstrated a high degree of alignment between the evaluated values and the actual values for AD and AO. Furthermore, this article analyzes the impact of the sampling state differentiation (SD) threshold during the construction of the nonintrusive feature (NIF) model on the subsequent evaluation of the robot’s dynamic AD. It demonstrates that a lower threshold for sampling SD threshold will effectively enhance the stability of the robot’s dynamic feature evaluation. Through experiments on safe collision control of robots along predetermined trajectory, it is proven that the method proposed in this article can achieve safe collision speed control for robots in human-robot interaction (HRI) scenarios, where the robot operates at a speed of 0.5 m/s.","PeriodicalId":13341,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"74 ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10934980/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proximity perception is a crucial foundation for robotic collision safety control, and e-skin proximity offers unique advantages in this field. However, traditional e-skin proximity data struggle to effectively distinguish between intrusive object data and the data from the robot itself and the surrounding environment, making it accurately evaluate collision features of intrusive objects. This article proposes a state-matching-based method for identifying intrusive object data and evaluating collision features using e-skin proximity. By establishing a nonintrusive feature model, the process extracts the nonintrusive feature data corresponding to the current robot state through state matching and compares it with the current e-skin proximity data. This allows for the effective identification of intrusive object data and the accurate and rapid evaluation of collision features, such as approach distance (AD) and approach orientation (AO). In the static experiments, the proposed method significantly improves the accuracy of evaluating AD and AO. In the dynamic experiments, the method proposed in this article demonstrated a high degree of alignment between the evaluated values and the actual values for AD and AO. Furthermore, this article analyzes the impact of the sampling state differentiation (SD) threshold during the construction of the nonintrusive feature (NIF) model on the subsequent evaluation of the robot’s dynamic AD. It demonstrates that a lower threshold for sampling SD threshold will effectively enhance the stability of the robot’s dynamic feature evaluation. Through experiments on safe collision control of robots along predetermined trajectory, it is proven that the method proposed in this article can achieve safe collision speed control for robots in human-robot interaction (HRI) scenarios, where the robot operates at a speed of 0.5 m/s.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
23.20%
发文量
1294
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Papers are sought that address innovative solutions to the development and use of electrical and electronic instruments and equipment to measure, monitor and/or record physical phenomena for the purpose of advancing measurement science, methods, functionality and applications. The scope of these papers may encompass: (1) theory, methodology, and practice of measurement; (2) design, development and evaluation of instrumentation and measurement systems and components used in generating, acquiring, conditioning and processing signals; (3) analysis, representation, display, and preservation of the information obtained from a set of measurements; and (4) scientific and technical support to establishment and maintenance of technical standards in the field of Instrumentation and Measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信