Multi-proxy approaches in Archaeobotany: Botanical reconstruction of ancient gardens from a Mediterranean perspective

IF 2.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Dafna Langgut
{"title":"Multi-proxy approaches in Archaeobotany: Botanical reconstruction of ancient gardens from a Mediterranean perspective","authors":"Dafna Langgut","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, the field of garden archaeology has expanded significantly in both temporal and spatial scopes, moving beyond its initial focus on the gardens of the Vesuvius region. These early Roman gardens, remarkably well-preserved, feature the first instances where garden soils were treated as archaeological artifacts. This innovative approach laid the groundwork for the study of ancient gardens in subsequent decades. The developments of this discipline in recent years are largely attributable to advancements in archaeobotanical techniques and the incorporation of new methodologies. This paper seeks to review the current knowledge of archaeobotanical methods used to identify ornamental plants cultivated in ancient gardens. The most efficient techniques involve microbotanical proxies such as palynology and phytolith analysis, as well as the study of macrobotanical remains, including wood, charcoal, seeds, and fruits. For each type of archaeobotanical method, this paper will explore sampling strategies, identification possibilities, data interpretation, and associated strengths and limitations. The article demonstrates that employing multiple archaeobotanical techniques enhances the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the resulting list of ornamental plants. Once such a list is established, it can be integrated with other evidence, such as root cavities, to reconstruct garden designs and identify gardening trends, including the use of exotic species or practices such as dwarfing trees and shrubs. Additionally, the suggested list of ornamental plants can help reconstruct the sensory experience of ancient gardens, considering the plants' colors, scents, and possible soundscapes. This sensory analysis is further enriched by examining the surrounding environment, the garden's visual communication, and its features, including walls, fountains, channels, pools, and statues. This review paper primarily focuses on the ancient gardens of the Mediterranean and the Near East, but the approaches discussed and the conclusions drawn are applicable to ancient gardens worldwide. Prospects of the discipline are also given.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 106209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325000585","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the field of garden archaeology has expanded significantly in both temporal and spatial scopes, moving beyond its initial focus on the gardens of the Vesuvius region. These early Roman gardens, remarkably well-preserved, feature the first instances where garden soils were treated as archaeological artifacts. This innovative approach laid the groundwork for the study of ancient gardens in subsequent decades. The developments of this discipline in recent years are largely attributable to advancements in archaeobotanical techniques and the incorporation of new methodologies. This paper seeks to review the current knowledge of archaeobotanical methods used to identify ornamental plants cultivated in ancient gardens. The most efficient techniques involve microbotanical proxies such as palynology and phytolith analysis, as well as the study of macrobotanical remains, including wood, charcoal, seeds, and fruits. For each type of archaeobotanical method, this paper will explore sampling strategies, identification possibilities, data interpretation, and associated strengths and limitations. The article demonstrates that employing multiple archaeobotanical techniques enhances the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the resulting list of ornamental plants. Once such a list is established, it can be integrated with other evidence, such as root cavities, to reconstruct garden designs and identify gardening trends, including the use of exotic species or practices such as dwarfing trees and shrubs. Additionally, the suggested list of ornamental plants can help reconstruct the sensory experience of ancient gardens, considering the plants' colors, scents, and possible soundscapes. This sensory analysis is further enriched by examining the surrounding environment, the garden's visual communication, and its features, including walls, fountains, channels, pools, and statues. This review paper primarily focuses on the ancient gardens of the Mediterranean and the Near East, but the approaches discussed and the conclusions drawn are applicable to ancient gardens worldwide. Prospects of the discipline are also given.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信