Evaluation of the measurement properties of premonitory urge patient-reported outcome measure: A systematic literature review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zehui Zhao, Qiuhan Cai , Ping Liu, Xuan Li, Yi Zhang, Yueyue Chen, Siyuan Hu
{"title":"Evaluation of the measurement properties of premonitory urge patient-reported outcome measure: A systematic literature review","authors":"Zehui Zhao,&nbsp;Qiuhan Cai ,&nbsp;Ping Liu,&nbsp;Xuan Li,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Yueyue Chen,&nbsp;Siyuan Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to systematically evaluate the measurement properties of premonitory urge patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with tic disorder using Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) methodology and provide recommendations for clinical assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, from database inception to October 9, 2022, with an additional supplementary search conducted from October 9, 2022, to January 4, 2025. After literature screening and data extraction, two independent reviewers objectively assessed the measurement properties according to COSMIN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 studies were included, involving four PROMs: Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS), University of São Paulo's Sensory Phenomena Scale (USP-SPS), Individualized Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (I-PUTS), and the Rumination and Awareness Scale for tic-associated sensations (RASTS). Methodological quality and criteria were conducted for content validity, internal structure (structural validity, internal consistency), and remaining measurement properties (reliability, hypothesis testing for construct validity).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PUTS is recommended for assessing premonitory urge in tic disorder, which aligns with the “European Clinical Guidelines for Tourette Syndrome and other Tic disorder—version 2.0. Part I: assessment”. To assess premonitory urge and sensory modulation disorder, the USP-SPS is deemed appropriate, while the RASTS is suitable for evaluating premonitory urge and tic-related cognitions. However, USP-SPS and RASTS need further validation due to limited evidence, and their use should be considered based on specific clinical or research objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"184 ","pages":"Pages 488-499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625001815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to systematically evaluate the measurement properties of premonitory urge patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with tic disorder using Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) methodology and provide recommendations for clinical assessment.

Method

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, from database inception to October 9, 2022, with an additional supplementary search conducted from October 9, 2022, to January 4, 2025. After literature screening and data extraction, two independent reviewers objectively assessed the measurement properties according to COSMIN.

Results

A total of 18 studies were included, involving four PROMs: Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS), University of São Paulo's Sensory Phenomena Scale (USP-SPS), Individualized Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (I-PUTS), and the Rumination and Awareness Scale for tic-associated sensations (RASTS). Methodological quality and criteria were conducted for content validity, internal structure (structural validity, internal consistency), and remaining measurement properties (reliability, hypothesis testing for construct validity).

Conclusion

PUTS is recommended for assessing premonitory urge in tic disorder, which aligns with the “European Clinical Guidelines for Tourette Syndrome and other Tic disorder—version 2.0. Part I: assessment”. To assess premonitory urge and sensory modulation disorder, the USP-SPS is deemed appropriate, while the RASTS is suitable for evaluating premonitory urge and tic-related cognitions. However, USP-SPS and RASTS need further validation due to limited evidence, and their use should be considered based on specific clinical or research objectives.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信