The use of vegetation in hydroelectric reservoir shoreline management: A global review of strategies and applications

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Myah Matthes, Micah May, Natasha Nolet, Nancy Shackelford
{"title":"The use of vegetation in hydroelectric reservoir shoreline management: A global review of strategies and applications","authors":"Myah Matthes,&nbsp;Micah May,&nbsp;Natasha Nolet,&nbsp;Nancy Shackelford","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydroelectric dams negatively impact reservoir shoreline vegetation, accelerating management issues such as erosion and sedimentation. Understanding the role of vegetation on reservoir shorelines is therefore increasingly relevant in its potential to benefit both shoreline ecosystems and hydroelectric management. We reviewed 103 peer-reviewed papers on the role of vegetation in reservoir management. Each paper was systematically examined to identify assessment strategies for shoreline vegetation and plant traits associated with high survival. We extended our search to include a targeted literature review of 17 grey literature reports from British Columbia (BC) Canada, a province with high hydroelectric power production and management concerns associated with reservoir erosion and dust emissions. We found that most peer-reviewed studies were observational, focusing on ecosystem change (55.3 %) and vegetation inventories (52.4 %) instead of experimental revegetation trials (15.5 %). Traits commonly linked to high survival were fast growth and short, annual life cycles, rhizomes, photosynthetic adaptability, and grass life forms. Functional traits related to the depth and extent of roots, and achieving high percent cover through rapid germination, growth and regeneration may be the most important factors in addressing erosion and sedimentation, making them strong candidates for future revegetation efforts. Most research was short-term and focused on North Temperate latitudes, highlighting the need for global studies on shoreline vegetation and plant traits. Our BC literature review included unpublished reports of successful revegetation efforts that can inform the peer-reviewed published literature. We advocate for publishing future management findings to support global practitioners as the demand for hydroelectric energy grows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydroelectric dams negatively impact reservoir shoreline vegetation, accelerating management issues such as erosion and sedimentation. Understanding the role of vegetation on reservoir shorelines is therefore increasingly relevant in its potential to benefit both shoreline ecosystems and hydroelectric management. We reviewed 103 peer-reviewed papers on the role of vegetation in reservoir management. Each paper was systematically examined to identify assessment strategies for shoreline vegetation and plant traits associated with high survival. We extended our search to include a targeted literature review of 17 grey literature reports from British Columbia (BC) Canada, a province with high hydroelectric power production and management concerns associated with reservoir erosion and dust emissions. We found that most peer-reviewed studies were observational, focusing on ecosystem change (55.3 %) and vegetation inventories (52.4 %) instead of experimental revegetation trials (15.5 %). Traits commonly linked to high survival were fast growth and short, annual life cycles, rhizomes, photosynthetic adaptability, and grass life forms. Functional traits related to the depth and extent of roots, and achieving high percent cover through rapid germination, growth and regeneration may be the most important factors in addressing erosion and sedimentation, making them strong candidates for future revegetation efforts. Most research was short-term and focused on North Temperate latitudes, highlighting the need for global studies on shoreline vegetation and plant traits. Our BC literature review included unpublished reports of successful revegetation efforts that can inform the peer-reviewed published literature. We advocate for publishing future management findings to support global practitioners as the demand for hydroelectric energy grows.
植被在水电站水库岸线管理中的应用:战略和应用的全球回顾
水电大坝对水库岸线植被产生负面影响,加速了侵蚀和沉积等管理问题。因此,了解植被在水库岸线上的作用,对岸线生态系统和水力发电管理都有潜在的好处。我们回顾了103篇同行评议的关于植被在水库管理中的作用的论文。对每篇论文进行系统检查,以确定与高存活率相关的岸线植被和植物性状的评估策略。我们扩大了我们的搜索范围,纳入了来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)的17篇灰色文献报告的有针对性的文献综述,这是一个与水库侵蚀和粉尘排放相关的高水电生产和管理问题的省份。我们发现大多数同行评议的研究都是观察性的,关注生态系统变化(55.3%)和植被清查(52.4%),而不是实验性的植被恢复试验(15.5%)。通常与高存活率相关的性状是生长快、年生周期短、根茎、光合适应性和草的生命形式。与根系的深度和广度相关的功能性状,以及通过快速发芽、生长和再生实现高覆盖率可能是解决侵蚀和沉积问题的最重要因素,使它们成为未来植被恢复工作的有力候选者。大多数研究都是短期的,集中在北温带地区,强调需要对海岸线植被和植物性状进行全球研究。我们的不列颠哥伦比亚省文献综述包括未发表的成功绿化工作报告,可以为同行评审的已发表文献提供信息。随着水电能源需求的增长,我们提倡发布未来的管理发现,以支持全球从业者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信