Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Arashi Shahid , Aricia Jieqi Thirumaran , Robin Christensen , Venkatesha Venkatesha , Marius Henriksen , Jocelyn L. Bowden , David J. Hunter
{"title":"Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials","authors":"Arashi Shahid ,&nbsp;Aricia Jieqi Thirumaran ,&nbsp;Robin Christensen ,&nbsp;Venkatesha Venkatesha ,&nbsp;Marius Henriksen ,&nbsp;Jocelyn L. Bowden ,&nbsp;David J. Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To ascertain the comparative effectiveness of weight-loss strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) to develop rational treatment algorithms aimed at improving OA-related symptoms in overweight/obese individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2023 for observational studies and randomized trials. Network meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist approach. Effect sizes for pain and function were computed as standardized mean differences (SMDs), while weighted mean differences were computed for body weight.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>14 RCTs on knee OA (KOA) (3215 participants) with 7 interventions: diet (D); exercise (E); diet and exercise (DE); pharmacological (L); psychological (P); psychological, diet, and exercise (PDE); and Mediterranean diets (M) were networked. For weight change (kg), all interventions significantly outperformed control comparators, with benefits ranging from −7.0 kg (95% CI: −12.1 to −2.0 kg) for the most effective approach (PDE) to −4.9 kg (95% CI: −6.8 to −3.0 kg) for the least effective approach (D). In terms of SMDs for pain, only PDE (−1.2, 95% CI: −2.2 to −0.3), and DE (−0.6, 95% CI: −1.0 to −0.2) outperformed control comparators in improving the pain. Regardless of the chosen intervention, prediction intervals from meta-regression analysis indicated that significant pain relief may be anticipated when patients achieve at least a weight reduction of 7.4%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PDE and DE interventions may offer the most effective approach for weight loss, potentially leading to significant improvements in pain and physical function among overweight/obese individuals with KOA if they achieve more than 7.4% weight loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 399-411"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458425000238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To ascertain the comparative effectiveness of weight-loss strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) to develop rational treatment algorithms aimed at improving OA-related symptoms in overweight/obese individuals.

Method

Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2023 for observational studies and randomized trials. Network meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist approach. Effect sizes for pain and function were computed as standardized mean differences (SMDs), while weighted mean differences were computed for body weight.

Results

14 RCTs on knee OA (KOA) (3215 participants) with 7 interventions: diet (D); exercise (E); diet and exercise (DE); pharmacological (L); psychological (P); psychological, diet, and exercise (PDE); and Mediterranean diets (M) were networked. For weight change (kg), all interventions significantly outperformed control comparators, with benefits ranging from −7.0 kg (95% CI: −12.1 to −2.0 kg) for the most effective approach (PDE) to −4.9 kg (95% CI: −6.8 to −3.0 kg) for the least effective approach (D). In terms of SMDs for pain, only PDE (−1.2, 95% CI: −2.2 to −0.3), and DE (−0.6, 95% CI: −1.0 to −0.2) outperformed control comparators in improving the pain. Regardless of the chosen intervention, prediction intervals from meta-regression analysis indicated that significant pain relief may be anticipated when patients achieve at least a weight reduction of 7.4%.

Conclusions

PDE and DE interventions may offer the most effective approach for weight loss, potentially leading to significant improvements in pain and physical function among overweight/obese individuals with KOA if they achieve more than 7.4% weight loss.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信