Evaluation of a customised, AI-focused educational seminar delivered to final year undergraduate radiography students in the UK: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Radiography Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2025.102926

N. Stogiannos , E. Skelton , S. Kumar , S. Ahmed , C. Amedu , C. Vince , M. Schiavottiello , C. O'Sullivan , C. Malamateniou

{"title":"Evaluation of a customised, AI-focused educational seminar delivered to final year undergraduate radiography students in the UK: A cross-sectional study","authors":"N. Stogiannos , E. Skelton , S. Kumar , S. Ahmed , C. Amedu , C. Vince , M. Schiavottiello , C. O'Sullivan , C. Malamateniou","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.102926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>AI education is essential to facilitate seamless clinical integration. The HCPC in the UK requires all radiographers to have some level of digital skills to maintain safety of clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a dedicated AI seminar on radiography students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dedicated 1.5-h in-person seminar was delivered by an AI vendor to final year undergraduate diagnostic radiography students at a UK University. The course consisted of both theory and practice training. An online survey was built and piloted, consisting of both closed and open-ended questions, to explore their level of knowledge, skills and confidence in AI, before (pre-test) and after the delivery (post-test) of the seminar using a 10-point scale. Pre-test was distributed two weeks before the seminar and post-test was open two weeks after.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 68 students answered the pre-test and 31 the post-test survey. Students’ theoretical knowledge (Mean = 6.57 vs Mean = 3.85), skills (Mean = 5.39 vs Mean = 3.44) and confidence (Mean = 5.47 vs Mean = 3.43) on AI were all significantly improved after the seminar. Their responses became more focused and specific in the post-test survey. In both surveys students expressed concerns around reliability and accountability of AI, data management and security, patient confidentiality and overreliance on technology in the open-ended questions. They also requested more AI training with hands-on options in their undergraduate degree.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study confirms the importance of even brief, but customised educational interventions relating to AI for radiographers. The learning needs to be customised to maximise knowledge retention and applicability and to include both theoretical and practical aspects for consolidation of skills.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>These findings will help radiography educators build more focused, tailored AI courses for future students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 3","pages":"Article 102926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

AI education is essential to facilitate seamless clinical integration. The HCPC in the UK requires all radiographers to have some level of digital skills to maintain safety of clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a dedicated AI seminar on radiography students.

Methods

A dedicated 1.5-h in-person seminar was delivered by an AI vendor to final year undergraduate diagnostic radiography students at a UK University. The course consisted of both theory and practice training. An online survey was built and piloted, consisting of both closed and open-ended questions, to explore their level of knowledge, skills and confidence in AI, before (pre-test) and after the delivery (post-test) of the seminar using a 10-point scale. Pre-test was distributed two weeks before the seminar and post-test was open two weeks after.

Results

A total of 68 students answered the pre-test and 31 the post-test survey. Students’ theoretical knowledge (Mean = 6.57 vs Mean = 3.85), skills (Mean = 5.39 vs Mean = 3.44) and confidence (Mean = 5.47 vs Mean = 3.43) on AI were all significantly improved after the seminar. Their responses became more focused and specific in the post-test survey. In both surveys students expressed concerns around reliability and accountability of AI, data management and security, patient confidentiality and overreliance on technology in the open-ended questions. They also requested more AI training with hands-on options in their undergraduate degree.

Conclusion

This study confirms the importance of even brief, but customised educational interventions relating to AI for radiographers. The learning needs to be customised to maximise knowledge retention and applicability and to include both theoretical and practical aspects for consolidation of skills.

Implications for practice

These findings will help radiography educators build more focused, tailored AI courses for future students.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

34.60%

发文量

169

审稿时长

63 days

期刊介绍： Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.