The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race for energy efficiency

Aitziber Mugarra , Cruz Borges , Leandro Ferrón , Oxana Soimu
{"title":"The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race for energy efficiency","authors":"Aitziber Mugarra ,&nbsp;Cruz Borges ,&nbsp;Leandro Ferrón ,&nbsp;Oxana Soimu","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amidst the pressing concern about climate change, the construction sector has been identified as one of the main energy consumers in Europe, which also positions it as one of the sectors with the greatest potential for efficiency improvements. In response to this, the European Union established the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) system, with the aim of boosting transparency and encouraging sustainable renovations. However, the results have not been as expected. Some of the causes of this are poor data quality, limited public awareness and inadequate legislation, which together undermine trust in the certification process. In addition, concerns about the possible exclusion of low-income households have sparked debates about the financial burdens and possible rent increases following energy efficiency improvements. This article presents insights from a qualitative study of various stakeholders, including public agencies, technical experts and real estate professionals, examining prevailing perceptions of EPC design, implementation and utility. Key findings reveal that mandatory policies drive adoption, but administrative complexities and inconsistent metrics erode public trust. Furthermore, the gap between specialist and non-specialist audiences prevents the certificate from playing a role in motivating behaviour change. The new version of the European Commission's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces standardised templates and databases. Added to this, stakeholder feedback highlights the need for public education, accurate energy data and tailored financial mechanisms. This study concludes that to refine EPC policies, integrated and holistic frameworks are needed that address socio-economic risks, foster equity and accelerate Europe's transition to low-carbon housing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 32-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328625000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amidst the pressing concern about climate change, the construction sector has been identified as one of the main energy consumers in Europe, which also positions it as one of the sectors with the greatest potential for efficiency improvements. In response to this, the European Union established the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) system, with the aim of boosting transparency and encouraging sustainable renovations. However, the results have not been as expected. Some of the causes of this are poor data quality, limited public awareness and inadequate legislation, which together undermine trust in the certification process. In addition, concerns about the possible exclusion of low-income households have sparked debates about the financial burdens and possible rent increases following energy efficiency improvements. This article presents insights from a qualitative study of various stakeholders, including public agencies, technical experts and real estate professionals, examining prevailing perceptions of EPC design, implementation and utility. Key findings reveal that mandatory policies drive adoption, but administrative complexities and inconsistent metrics erode public trust. Furthermore, the gap between specialist and non-specialist audiences prevents the certificate from playing a role in motivating behaviour change. The new version of the European Commission's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) introduces standardised templates and databases. Added to this, stakeholder feedback highlights the need for public education, accurate energy data and tailored financial mechanisms. This study concludes that to refine EPC policies, integrated and holistic frameworks are needed that address socio-economic risks, foster equity and accelerate Europe's transition to low-carbon housing.
EPCs的未来:能源效率竞赛中的数据、政策和公众认知
随着人们对气候变化的迫切关注,建筑行业已被确定为欧洲的主要能源消耗行业之一,这也使其成为最有潜力提高能效的行业之一。为此,欧盟建立了能源性能证书(EPC)制度,旨在提高透明度,鼓励可持续翻新。然而,结果并不尽如人意。究其原因,数据质量差、公众意识有限、立法不完善等因素共同削弱了人们对认证过程的信任。此外,对低收入家庭可能被排除在外的担忧也引发了对提高能效后的经济负担和可能的租金上涨的争论。本文介绍了对包括公共机构、技术专家和房地产专业人士在内的各利益相关方进行定性研究后得出的见解,探讨了对 EPC 设计、实施和效用的普遍看法。主要研究结果表明,强制性政策推动了采用,但复杂的行政管理和不一致的衡量标准削弱了公众的信任。此外,专家与非专家受众之间的差距也阻碍了证书在推动行为改变方面发挥作用。欧盟委员会新版《建筑能效指令》(EPBD)引入了标准化模板和数据库。此外,利益相关者的反馈意见也强调了对公众教育、准确的能源数据和量身定制的金融机制的需求。本研究的结论是,为完善 EPC 政策,需要建立综合全面的框架,以应对社会经济风险、促进公平并加快欧洲向低碳住房的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信