{"title":"Disagreement in Chinese blue-collar workplace small talk: The role of assessments relating to regional knowledge","authors":"Buqing Yu, Dorien Van De Mieroop","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores some of the complexities of small talk in Chinese blue-collar workplaces, focusing on disagreements within these interactions. Particularly, we zoom in on how these disagreements can be initiated and navigated through assessments relating to regional knowledge, as these may construct epistemic primacy, both sequentially and on a contextual basis. Drawing on authentic recordings and ethnographic fieldnotes, we investigate these interactions by means of a qualitative discourse analytical approach. At first sight, our findings suggest that the small talk sequences in our data are a locus for expressing difference and foregrounding varying degrees of tension. Yet, we argue that through disagreeing, the participants may also demonstrate engagement in the interaction and may thus, in one form or another, establish rapport as well. In this way, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of workplace small talk and disagreement, emphasizing their multifaceted nature, while also extending the scope of current research to under-researched workplace contexts such as Chinese blue-collar workplaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"241 ","pages":"Pages 16-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000682","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores some of the complexities of small talk in Chinese blue-collar workplaces, focusing on disagreements within these interactions. Particularly, we zoom in on how these disagreements can be initiated and navigated through assessments relating to regional knowledge, as these may construct epistemic primacy, both sequentially and on a contextual basis. Drawing on authentic recordings and ethnographic fieldnotes, we investigate these interactions by means of a qualitative discourse analytical approach. At first sight, our findings suggest that the small talk sequences in our data are a locus for expressing difference and foregrounding varying degrees of tension. Yet, we argue that through disagreeing, the participants may also demonstrate engagement in the interaction and may thus, in one form or another, establish rapport as well. In this way, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of workplace small talk and disagreement, emphasizing their multifaceted nature, while also extending the scope of current research to under-researched workplace contexts such as Chinese blue-collar workplaces.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.