Development and validation of global tau severity score in Alzheimer's disease using Florzolotau (18F) PET

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mu-N Liu , Hsin-I Chang , Shu-Hua Huang , Chi-Wei Huang , Shih-Wei Hsu , Kun-Ju Lin , Tsung-Ying Ho , Kuo-Lun Huang , Chih-Ming Cheng , Chiung-Chih Chang
{"title":"Development and validation of global tau severity score in Alzheimer's disease using Florzolotau (18F) PET","authors":"Mu-N Liu ,&nbsp;Hsin-I Chang ,&nbsp;Shu-Hua Huang ,&nbsp;Chi-Wei Huang ,&nbsp;Shih-Wei Hsu ,&nbsp;Kun-Ju Lin ,&nbsp;Tsung-Ying Ho ,&nbsp;Kuo-Lun Huang ,&nbsp;Chih-Ming Cheng ,&nbsp;Chiung-Chih Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tau-specific positron emission tomography (tau-PET) is valuable for assessing Alzheimer's disease (AD) severity, with phenotypic differences between young-onset AD (YOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) likely driven by distinct relationships between tau pathology and cognition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study developed a global tau severity (gTS) scale using Florzolotau (18F) PET and compared it with the CenTauR score for standardizing tau burden quantification.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 186 participants were enrolled, including a pilot group (15 cognitive unimpaired controls [CTL], 15 AD patients) and a validation group (27 CTL, 67 YOAD, and 62 LOAD patients). In the validation group, cutoffs for diagnosing YOAD and LOAD using the gTS or CenTauR score were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The white matter region was identified as the most suitable reference for Florzolotau (18F). The gTS cutoff values of 24.1 for both AD and YOAD and 34.1 for LOAD demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC). The gTS score showed a higher AUC compared to CenTauR in YOAD versus CTL or LOAD versus CTL. The gTS scores significantly predicted total scores and subdomains on cognitive ability screening instruments. Cognitive-gTS curve features were found to have quadratic and linear relationships with YOAD and LOAD, respectively, illustrating different relationships between gTS scores and cognition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The gTS score, derived from Florzolotau (18F) PET scans, provides significant predictions regarding tau burden and cognitive measurements. The higher AUC of gTS compared to the CenTauR universal scores indicates that gTS scores offer a robust method for differentiating AD from CTL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 111343"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584625000971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tau-specific positron emission tomography (tau-PET) is valuable for assessing Alzheimer's disease (AD) severity, with phenotypic differences between young-onset AD (YOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) likely driven by distinct relationships between tau pathology and cognition.

Objective

This study developed a global tau severity (gTS) scale using Florzolotau (18F) PET and compared it with the CenTauR score for standardizing tau burden quantification.

Methods

A total of 186 participants were enrolled, including a pilot group (15 cognitive unimpaired controls [CTL], 15 AD patients) and a validation group (27 CTL, 67 YOAD, and 62 LOAD patients). In the validation group, cutoffs for diagnosing YOAD and LOAD using the gTS or CenTauR score were calculated.

Results

The white matter region was identified as the most suitable reference for Florzolotau (18F). The gTS cutoff values of 24.1 for both AD and YOAD and 34.1 for LOAD demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC). The gTS score showed a higher AUC compared to CenTauR in YOAD versus CTL or LOAD versus CTL. The gTS scores significantly predicted total scores and subdomains on cognitive ability screening instruments. Cognitive-gTS curve features were found to have quadratic and linear relationships with YOAD and LOAD, respectively, illustrating different relationships between gTS scores and cognition.

Conclusion

The gTS score, derived from Florzolotau (18F) PET scans, provides significant predictions regarding tau burden and cognitive measurements. The higher AUC of gTS compared to the CenTauR universal scores indicates that gTS scores offer a robust method for differentiating AD from CTL.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信