Utility and limitations of Merlin immunohistochemistry for mesothelioma diagnosis in tissue sections and cell blocks

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Kazuki Nabeshima , Makoto Hamasaki , Tomomi Furukawa , Shinji Matsumoto , Katsumi Takizawa , Makiko Adachi , Yuko Goto
{"title":"Utility and limitations of Merlin immunohistochemistry for mesothelioma diagnosis in tissue sections and cell blocks","authors":"Kazuki Nabeshima ,&nbsp;Makoto Hamasaki ,&nbsp;Tomomi Furukawa ,&nbsp;Shinji Matsumoto ,&nbsp;Katsumi Takizawa ,&nbsp;Makiko Adachi ,&nbsp;Yuko Goto","doi":"10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2025.152475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distinguishing pleural mesothelioma (PM) from reactive mesothelial proliferations (RMP) can be challenging. In such cases, immunohistochemistry (IHC)-detected BAP1 or MTAP loss and FISH-detected <em>CDKN2A</em> homozygous deletion are effective. Merlin is the protein product of the <em>NF2</em> gene, which is frequently altered in mesotheliomas. Recently, IHC-detected loss of Merlin was also shown to be useful in differentiating PM from RMP. To validate these findings, we examined Merlin IHC in PM cases, including for the first time cytologic material. Merlin IHC was performed on 67 PM cases, including 47 samples from tissues and 20 from cell blocks (CBs), and 29 RMP cases. In RMP, Merlin was expressed in cell membranes and cytoplasm, with no loss. Merlin expression was lost in 49 % of PM tissues. In discriminating PM from RMP, addition of Merlin IHC to the combination of BAP1 and MTAP IHC increased sensitivity from 77 % to 95 %. However, Merlin expression could not be assessed in 8.5 % of tissues and 25 % of CBs. In CBs, Merlin loss could be assessed only in sheeted or clustered tumor cells, because PM cells could not be identified precisely in few scattered tumor cells. In cases where both tissue biopsy and CBs were available, results matched in only 50 % of cases, suggesting uneven occurrence of Merlin loss in PM tissues. Our observations support the effectiveness of Merlin IHC in differentiating PM from RMP. However, investigators should be familiar with potential challenges in interpreting Merlin IHC results, especially in CBs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50768,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 152475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092913425000401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distinguishing pleural mesothelioma (PM) from reactive mesothelial proliferations (RMP) can be challenging. In such cases, immunohistochemistry (IHC)-detected BAP1 or MTAP loss and FISH-detected CDKN2A homozygous deletion are effective. Merlin is the protein product of the NF2 gene, which is frequently altered in mesotheliomas. Recently, IHC-detected loss of Merlin was also shown to be useful in differentiating PM from RMP. To validate these findings, we examined Merlin IHC in PM cases, including for the first time cytologic material. Merlin IHC was performed on 67 PM cases, including 47 samples from tissues and 20 from cell blocks (CBs), and 29 RMP cases. In RMP, Merlin was expressed in cell membranes and cytoplasm, with no loss. Merlin expression was lost in 49 % of PM tissues. In discriminating PM from RMP, addition of Merlin IHC to the combination of BAP1 and MTAP IHC increased sensitivity from 77 % to 95 %. However, Merlin expression could not be assessed in 8.5 % of tissues and 25 % of CBs. In CBs, Merlin loss could be assessed only in sheeted or clustered tumor cells, because PM cells could not be identified precisely in few scattered tumor cells. In cases where both tissue biopsy and CBs were available, results matched in only 50 % of cases, suggesting uneven occurrence of Merlin loss in PM tissues. Our observations support the effectiveness of Merlin IHC in differentiating PM from RMP. However, investigators should be familiar with potential challenges in interpreting Merlin IHC results, especially in CBs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
149
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of articles dealing with traditional morphologic studies using standard diagnostic techniques and stressing clinicopathological correlations and scientific observation of relevance to the daily practice of pathology. Special features include pathologic-radiologic correlations and pathologic-cytologic correlations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信