Mariusz Baranowski , Piotr Jabkowski , Daniel M. Kammen
{"title":"From the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the battlefield of the future: The geopolitical fight for Ukraine's mineral wealth","authors":"Mariusz Baranowski , Piotr Jabkowski , Daniel M. Kammen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The geopolitical significance of critical minerals and rare earth elements has intensified in the context of global energy transitions and shifting power dynamics. This article examines how Russia's invasion of Ukraine can be understood through the lens of adaptive resource geopolitics, wherein control over strategic minerals – such as graphite, lithium, titanium, and rare earth elements – has become a crucial factor in the conflict. While traditionally analyzed through NATO expansion and security concerns, Russia's occupation of mineral-rich territories suggests a broader strategy to sustain its influence in a post-fossil fuel world. The European Green Deal has diminished Russia's leverage over fossil fuel exports, compelling the Kremlin to seek new means of maintaining geopolitical dominance. Simultaneously, the United States has increasingly incorporated Ukraine's mineral wealth into diplomatic negotiations, reflecting the rising strategic importance of these resources. Against this backdrop, the EU's response remains ambiguous, caught between its renewable energy ambitions and structural dependencies. This analysis underscores the urgent need for coordinated international policies on mineral security, as access to critical resources will shape future geopolitical alignments, energy strategies, and global economic stability.</div></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><div>Russia's control over Ukraine's critical minerals highlights resource-driven geopolitics, impacting renewable energy transitions and global security. The European Green Deal and U.S. policies underscore the environmental stakes of this competition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104043"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The geopolitical significance of critical minerals and rare earth elements has intensified in the context of global energy transitions and shifting power dynamics. This article examines how Russia's invasion of Ukraine can be understood through the lens of adaptive resource geopolitics, wherein control over strategic minerals – such as graphite, lithium, titanium, and rare earth elements – has become a crucial factor in the conflict. While traditionally analyzed through NATO expansion and security concerns, Russia's occupation of mineral-rich territories suggests a broader strategy to sustain its influence in a post-fossil fuel world. The European Green Deal has diminished Russia's leverage over fossil fuel exports, compelling the Kremlin to seek new means of maintaining geopolitical dominance. Simultaneously, the United States has increasingly incorporated Ukraine's mineral wealth into diplomatic negotiations, reflecting the rising strategic importance of these resources. Against this backdrop, the EU's response remains ambiguous, caught between its renewable energy ambitions and structural dependencies. This analysis underscores the urgent need for coordinated international policies on mineral security, as access to critical resources will shape future geopolitical alignments, energy strategies, and global economic stability.
Synopsis
Russia's control over Ukraine's critical minerals highlights resource-driven geopolitics, impacting renewable energy transitions and global security. The European Green Deal and U.S. policies underscore the environmental stakes of this competition.
关键矿物和稀土元素的地缘政治意义在全球能源转型和权力动态变化的背景下得到加强。本文探讨了如何通过适应性资源地缘政治的视角来理解俄罗斯入侵乌克兰,其中对战略矿产(如石墨、锂、钛和稀土元素)的控制已成为冲突中的关键因素。虽然传统上通过北约扩张和安全问题来分析,但俄罗斯对矿产资源丰富的领土的占领表明,它在化石燃料后的世界里,采取了一种更广泛的战略,以维持其影响力。《欧洲绿色协议》(European Green Deal)削弱了俄罗斯在化石燃料出口方面的影响力,迫使克里姆林宫寻求维持地缘政治主导地位的新手段。与此同时,美国越来越多地将乌克兰的矿产资源纳入外交谈判,反映出这些资源日益上升的战略重要性。在这种背景下,欧盟的回应仍然模棱两可,夹在可再生能源的雄心和对结构的依赖之间。这一分析强调,迫切需要在矿产安全方面制定协调一致的国际政策,因为获取关键资源将影响未来的地缘政治格局、能源战略和全球经济稳定。俄罗斯对乌克兰关键矿产的控制凸显了资源驱动的地缘政治,影响着可再生能源转型和全球安全。欧洲的绿色协议和美国的政策强调了这种竞争的环境利害关系。
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.