E. Artemi, S.N. Michaleas, I. Dimitriadis, I. Nikolakakis, M. Karamanou
{"title":"Christian ethos and ethics as presuppositions for organ transplantation","authors":"E. Artemi, S.N. Michaleas, I. Dimitriadis, I. Nikolakakis, M. Karamanou","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In this paper, we will analyze Christian ethos and ethics as presupposition to organ transplantation. Orthodox Christian ethical teaching consistently addresses life issues, including those related to medicine. These sources form the foundation for the Church's guidance on complex medical ethics, including organ transplantation. When it comes to organ transplants, the Church identifies two keys ethical considerations: the potential harm to the donor and the need of the recipient.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To present that the Church does not inherently oppose organ donation, recognizing its potential to save lives. Christianity emphasizes the importance of carefully weighing the ethical implications, ensuring that the dignity and life of both donor and recipient are respected.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Bibliographical research in the Bible, Church Fathers’ writings, canon laws, and the sacramental life of the Church was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Church's stance on organ transplantation is one of cautious support, grounded in deep theological principles. While it encourages the act of organ donation as a manifestation of Christian love and solidarity, it also calls for a careful and spiritually mindful approach that respects both the sacredness of the body and the conscience of individual believers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
In this paper, we will analyze Christian ethos and ethics as presupposition to organ transplantation. Orthodox Christian ethical teaching consistently addresses life issues, including those related to medicine. These sources form the foundation for the Church's guidance on complex medical ethics, including organ transplantation. When it comes to organ transplants, the Church identifies two keys ethical considerations: the potential harm to the donor and the need of the recipient.
Objectives
To present that the Church does not inherently oppose organ donation, recognizing its potential to save lives. Christianity emphasizes the importance of carefully weighing the ethical implications, ensuring that the dignity and life of both donor and recipient are respected.
Methods
Bibliographical research in the Bible, Church Fathers’ writings, canon laws, and the sacramental life of the Church was conducted.
Conclusion
Church's stance on organ transplantation is one of cautious support, grounded in deep theological principles. While it encourages the act of organ donation as a manifestation of Christian love and solidarity, it also calls for a careful and spiritually mindful approach that respects both the sacredness of the body and the conscience of individual believers.
期刊介绍:
This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.