Magmatic-hydrothermal processes forming the Meishan iron oxide-apatite deposit in the Ningwu volcanic basin (Eastern China): Insights from trace element and Fe-O isotope data of magnetite
Wan-Ting Li , Chuan-Yu Zhang , Guang Wen , Hao Hu , Xin-Fu Zhao , Jian-Wei Li
{"title":"Magmatic-hydrothermal processes forming the Meishan iron oxide-apatite deposit in the Ningwu volcanic basin (Eastern China): Insights from trace element and Fe-O isotope data of magnetite","authors":"Wan-Ting Li , Chuan-Yu Zhang , Guang Wen , Hao Hu , Xin-Fu Zhao , Jian-Wei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits are an important source for Fe that is variably accompanied by other elements such as P, Co, and REE. Still, their origin remains enigmatic, with existing models highlighting the role of magmatic, liquid immiscibility, magmatic hydrothermal processes, or a combination of those processes. Here we present new trace element and Fe-O isotope data of magnetite from the Meishan IOA deposit (338Mt iron-oxide ores) in Eastern China to further constrain the ore genesis. The Meishan deposit consists of disseminated, massive, and vein-type iron ores that are hosted within the Early Cretaceous andesitic rocks and, less significantly, in a coeval porphyritic gabbro-diorite intrusion. Petrographic and textural studies reveal six types of magnetite from the gabbro-diorite porphyry and various types of iron ores, and many of them show dissolution-reprecipitation textures. Trace element concentrations of magnetite, notably Ti, Al, Ga, and V, progressively decrease upwards, indicating a cooling trend likely from magmatic to hydrothermal conditions. A similar decreasing trend is also observed from magmatic magnetite in the ore-hosting rocks through massive and brecciated to the vein-type ores. Magnetite from the vein-type ores has δ<sup>56</sup>Fe values of 0.14–0.41 ‰ and δ<sup>18</sup>O values of 4.38–5.53 ‰, which are similar to those for the gabbro-diorite porphyry (0.25–0.36 ‰ and 3.77–4.62 ‰) and for the massive ores (0.16–0.19 ‰ and 3.41–5.70 ‰), respectively. The above textural, elemental, and isotopic evidence indicate that the Meishan IOA deposit is of magmatic-hydrothermal origin and records repeated vents of hydrothermal fluids.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19644,"journal":{"name":"Ore Geology Reviews","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore Geology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169136825001362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iron oxide-apatite (IOA) deposits are an important source for Fe that is variably accompanied by other elements such as P, Co, and REE. Still, their origin remains enigmatic, with existing models highlighting the role of magmatic, liquid immiscibility, magmatic hydrothermal processes, or a combination of those processes. Here we present new trace element and Fe-O isotope data of magnetite from the Meishan IOA deposit (338Mt iron-oxide ores) in Eastern China to further constrain the ore genesis. The Meishan deposit consists of disseminated, massive, and vein-type iron ores that are hosted within the Early Cretaceous andesitic rocks and, less significantly, in a coeval porphyritic gabbro-diorite intrusion. Petrographic and textural studies reveal six types of magnetite from the gabbro-diorite porphyry and various types of iron ores, and many of them show dissolution-reprecipitation textures. Trace element concentrations of magnetite, notably Ti, Al, Ga, and V, progressively decrease upwards, indicating a cooling trend likely from magmatic to hydrothermal conditions. A similar decreasing trend is also observed from magmatic magnetite in the ore-hosting rocks through massive and brecciated to the vein-type ores. Magnetite from the vein-type ores has δ56Fe values of 0.14–0.41 ‰ and δ18O values of 4.38–5.53 ‰, which are similar to those for the gabbro-diorite porphyry (0.25–0.36 ‰ and 3.77–4.62 ‰) and for the massive ores (0.16–0.19 ‰ and 3.41–5.70 ‰), respectively. The above textural, elemental, and isotopic evidence indicate that the Meishan IOA deposit is of magmatic-hydrothermal origin and records repeated vents of hydrothermal fluids.
期刊介绍:
Ore Geology Reviews aims to familiarize all earth scientists with recent advances in a number of interconnected disciplines related to the study of, and search for, ore deposits. The reviews range from brief to longer contributions, but the journal preferentially publishes manuscripts that fill the niche between the commonly shorter journal articles and the comprehensive book coverages, and thus has a special appeal to many authors and readers.