Michael H. Buoni , Ashley C. Kennedy , Virginia Hughes , Esther Biswas-Fiss
{"title":"Statewide surveillance of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected in Delaware using novel multiplex PCR assays","authors":"Michael H. Buoni , Ashley C. Kennedy , Virginia Hughes , Esther Biswas-Fiss","doi":"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tick-borne pathogens are responsible for most vector-borne human diseases in the United States. With the growing recognition of tick-borne diseases and the expanding range of ticks, it is imperative to understand which pathogens, and in what prevalence, are carried by tick species in areas populated by humans. Few studies exist surveying the presence and distribution of tick-borne pathogens in the state of Delaware. The goal of this study was to create multiplex real-time PCR assays to identify <em>Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Babesia microti, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis,</em> and <em>Ehrlichia ewingii</em> from their respective tick vectors collected across the state of Delaware.</div><div>Two multiplex, real-time PCR assays were developed and tested on 1027 ticks comprising <em>Ixodes scapularis</em> and <em>Amblyomma americanum</em>, two species of ticks commonly encountered in Delaware. The results showed that in a sample of 500 <em>Ixodes scapularis</em> ticks, 30.20 % were positive for <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em>, 2.60 % were positive for <em>Babesia microti</em>, and 1 % were positive for <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em>. Testing of 527 <em>A. americanum</em> ticks showed that 4.74 % were positive for <em>E. chaffeensis</em> and 1.14 % were positive for <em>E. ewingii</em>. These findings suggest that these five tick-borne pathogens are present across the state of Delaware and therefore pose a risk to the public.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224425000239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tick-borne pathogens are responsible for most vector-borne human diseases in the United States. With the growing recognition of tick-borne diseases and the expanding range of ticks, it is imperative to understand which pathogens, and in what prevalence, are carried by tick species in areas populated by humans. Few studies exist surveying the presence and distribution of tick-borne pathogens in the state of Delaware. The goal of this study was to create multiplex real-time PCR assays to identify Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Babesia microti, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Ehrlichia ewingii from their respective tick vectors collected across the state of Delaware.
Two multiplex, real-time PCR assays were developed and tested on 1027 ticks comprising Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum, two species of ticks commonly encountered in Delaware. The results showed that in a sample of 500 Ixodes scapularis ticks, 30.20 % were positive for Borrelia burgdorferi, 2.60 % were positive for Babesia microti, and 1 % were positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Testing of 527 A. americanum ticks showed that 4.74 % were positive for E. chaffeensis and 1.14 % were positive for E. ewingii. These findings suggest that these five tick-borne pathogens are present across the state of Delaware and therefore pose a risk to the public.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (IJP-PAW) publishes the results of original research on parasites of all wildlife, invertebrate and vertebrate. This includes free-ranging, wild populations, as well as captive wildlife, semi-domesticated species (e.g. reindeer) and farmed populations of recently domesticated or wild-captured species (e.g. cultured fishes). Articles on all aspects of wildlife parasitology are welcomed including taxonomy, biodiversity and distribution, ecology and epidemiology, population biology and host-parasite relationships. The impact of parasites on the health and conservation of wildlife is seen as an important area covered by the journal especially the potential role of environmental factors, for example climate. Also important to the journal is ''one health'' and the nature of interactions between wildlife, people and domestic animals, including disease emergence and zoonoses.