Effects of arm movement on emotional state and walking outcomes during height-induced postural threat in healthy young adults

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Johanna Lambrich , Mathew W. Hill , Thomas Muehlbauer , Anna M. Wissmann
{"title":"Effects of arm movement on emotional state and walking outcomes during height-induced postural threat in healthy young adults","authors":"Johanna Lambrich ,&nbsp;Mathew W. Hill ,&nbsp;Thomas Muehlbauer ,&nbsp;Anna M. Wissmann","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is evidence that height-induced postural threat leads to detrimental effects on walking performance. However, little is known about how the additional restriction of stabilizing arm movements affects gait and emotional state outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose was to investigate how the restriction of arm movement affects subjective and objective balance-related measures during walking at or above ground-level.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-two healthy young adults (11 males, 11 females; mean ± SD age; 24.4 ± 4.9 years) walked five meters at self-selected speed on ground-level (no threat) and 80 cm above ground-level (threat) with free and restricted arm movement. Emotional state outcomes were quantified by assessing self-reported balance confidence, fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing. Walking outcomes (i.e., gait velocity, cadence, step time, normal impulse) were calculated using pressure-detecting insoles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Irrespective of arm movement condition, height-induced postural threat evoked a decrease in balance confidence and increases in fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing as well as deteriorations in walking outcomes (i.e., decrease in gait speed and cadence; increase in step time and normal impulse). For balance confidence and step time, the threat-induced impairments were further amplified when arm movements were restricted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The strengthening of the height-induced deteriorations in emotional state (balance confidence) and walking (step time) outcomes due to the restriction of the arm movements emphasizes the importance of stabilizing, free arm movements (‘upper body strategy’) for dynamic postural control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"119 ","pages":"Pages 197-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225001444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is evidence that height-induced postural threat leads to detrimental effects on walking performance. However, little is known about how the additional restriction of stabilizing arm movements affects gait and emotional state outcomes.

Objective

The purpose was to investigate how the restriction of arm movement affects subjective and objective balance-related measures during walking at or above ground-level.

Methods

Twenty-two healthy young adults (11 males, 11 females; mean ± SD age; 24.4 ± 4.9 years) walked five meters at self-selected speed on ground-level (no threat) and 80 cm above ground-level (threat) with free and restricted arm movement. Emotional state outcomes were quantified by assessing self-reported balance confidence, fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing. Walking outcomes (i.e., gait velocity, cadence, step time, normal impulse) were calculated using pressure-detecting insoles.

Results

Irrespective of arm movement condition, height-induced postural threat evoked a decrease in balance confidence and increases in fear of falling, perceived instability, and conscious balance processing as well as deteriorations in walking outcomes (i.e., decrease in gait speed and cadence; increase in step time and normal impulse). For balance confidence and step time, the threat-induced impairments were further amplified when arm movements were restricted.

Conclusions

The strengthening of the height-induced deteriorations in emotional state (balance confidence) and walking (step time) outcomes due to the restriction of the arm movements emphasizes the importance of stabilizing, free arm movements (‘upper body strategy’) for dynamic postural control.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信