{"title":"Error estimation and data fusion of root zone soil moisture products over China based on the three corned hat method","authors":"Jing Tian, Yongqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Root zone soil moisture (RZSM) plays a critical role in numerous ecological and environmental processes and holds significant importance for agriculture, hydrology, and climate studies. Although it can be estimated by hydrology or land surface models, the accuracy of such estimations is often limited. Data fusion offers a promising approach to improving RZSM estimation accuracy, yet few studies have explored this avenue. In our study, we address this gap by providing error estimation and data fusion for five RZSM datasets (ERA5-Land, MERRA2, CFSR, SMAP, GLDAS_NOAH2.1 (NOAH)) using the Three Cornered Hat (TCH) method. We evaluated the performance of the TCH method in assessing RZSM data products and in RZSM merging. Our results demonstrate that the TCH method accurately assesses the performance of RZSM products as validated against in situ measurements. Both in situ-based RMSE and TCH-based uncertainties reveal that MERRA2 and NOAH exhibit the best performance, followed by SMAP, CFSR and ERA5, with uncertainty medians of 0.019, 0.0187, 0.023, 0.021 and 0.028 (m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup>), respectively. Comparisons of the accuracy for the TCH merged result and the individual RZSM product indicate that the merged result outperforms each individual product. The percentages of RMSE differences between the TCH merged result and the individual products less than −0.005 are 60.8 %, 62.3 %, 36.8 %, 41.7 %, and 51.2 % for CFSR, ERA5-Land, MERRA2, NOAH, and SMAP, respectively. These are significantly higher than the percentages of RMSE differences greater than 0.005. Given the TCH method's independence from in situ measurements, it is a promising option for RZSM data fusion. Overall, our study underscores the potential of the TCH method in evaluating RZSM products and performing data fusion to enhance RZSM estimation accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104797"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Root zone soil moisture (RZSM) plays a critical role in numerous ecological and environmental processes and holds significant importance for agriculture, hydrology, and climate studies. Although it can be estimated by hydrology or land surface models, the accuracy of such estimations is often limited. Data fusion offers a promising approach to improving RZSM estimation accuracy, yet few studies have explored this avenue. In our study, we address this gap by providing error estimation and data fusion for five RZSM datasets (ERA5-Land, MERRA2, CFSR, SMAP, GLDAS_NOAH2.1 (NOAH)) using the Three Cornered Hat (TCH) method. We evaluated the performance of the TCH method in assessing RZSM data products and in RZSM merging. Our results demonstrate that the TCH method accurately assesses the performance of RZSM products as validated against in situ measurements. Both in situ-based RMSE and TCH-based uncertainties reveal that MERRA2 and NOAH exhibit the best performance, followed by SMAP, CFSR and ERA5, with uncertainty medians of 0.019, 0.0187, 0.023, 0.021 and 0.028 (m3/m3), respectively. Comparisons of the accuracy for the TCH merged result and the individual RZSM product indicate that the merged result outperforms each individual product. The percentages of RMSE differences between the TCH merged result and the individual products less than −0.005 are 60.8 %, 62.3 %, 36.8 %, 41.7 %, and 51.2 % for CFSR, ERA5-Land, MERRA2, NOAH, and SMAP, respectively. These are significantly higher than the percentages of RMSE differences greater than 0.005. Given the TCH method's independence from in situ measurements, it is a promising option for RZSM data fusion. Overall, our study underscores the potential of the TCH method in evaluating RZSM products and performing data fusion to enhance RZSM estimation accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems.
Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged.
Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.