Effects of plant carbon inputs and soil microbe on soil organic carbon accumulation in different tropical vegetation restoration strategies

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ying Wang , Di Li , Qiu Yang , Jing-li Lu , Yamin Jiang , Tianyan Su , Amani Milinga , Qian Shi , Wenjie Liu , Huai Yang , Mengyang Fang
{"title":"Effects of plant carbon inputs and soil microbe on soil organic carbon accumulation in different tropical vegetation restoration strategies","authors":"Ying Wang ,&nbsp;Di Li ,&nbsp;Qiu Yang ,&nbsp;Jing-li Lu ,&nbsp;Yamin Jiang ,&nbsp;Tianyan Su ,&nbsp;Amani Milinga ,&nbsp;Qian Shi ,&nbsp;Wenjie Liu ,&nbsp;Huai Yang ,&nbsp;Mengyang Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegetation restoration is an important measure for improving soil carbon sequestration in degraded agricultural ecosystems. However, the soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics under different vegetation restoration strategies in tropical regions are understood well. This study investigated SOC, biotic, and abiotic factors across the soil profile (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, and 40–60 cm) for four vegetation restoration strategies, including <em>Hopea hainanensis</em> × <em>Homalium ceylanicum</em> (HH), <em>Syzygium cumini</em> × <em>Dalbergia odorifera</em> (SD), <em>Aquilaria sinensis</em> × <em>Hopea hainanensis</em> (AH), and <em>Syzygium cumini</em> × <em>Hopea hainanensis</em> (SH), with barren land (CK) and secondary forest (SF) as the control and reference groups, respectively. Our findings demonstrated that vegetation restoration effectively increased the SOC content. In comparison to CK, the SOC content was relatively high in SD (12.82 ± 0.59 g/kg–18.50 ± 0.97 g/kg) and SH (14.67 ± 0.22 g/kg–20.15 ± 0.91 g/kg) following vegetation restoration in the 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil layers (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). This depends on the difference in biomass produced by different tree species' combinations, and high plant carbon inputs in SD (388.45 ± 44.61 g/kg) and SH (424.88 ± 18.92 g/kg) treatments will accelerate the return of carbon to soil. The results of the random forest and PLS-PM models identified that microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) were the two most important SOC predictors, which promote SOC accumulation in conjunction with plant-derived carbon. Further, it was also found that soil nutrient availability enhanced SOC accumulation by promoting the production of MNC. This process was negatively associated with carbon-acquiring enzyme activities. This study could provide a reference for the selection of SOC sequestration vegetation restoration strategies in tropical forests of southern China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation restoration is an important measure for improving soil carbon sequestration in degraded agricultural ecosystems. However, the soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics under different vegetation restoration strategies in tropical regions are understood well. This study investigated SOC, biotic, and abiotic factors across the soil profile (0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, and 40–60 cm) for four vegetation restoration strategies, including Hopea hainanensis × Homalium ceylanicum (HH), Syzygium cumini × Dalbergia odorifera (SD), Aquilaria sinensis × Hopea hainanensis (AH), and Syzygium cumini × Hopea hainanensis (SH), with barren land (CK) and secondary forest (SF) as the control and reference groups, respectively. Our findings demonstrated that vegetation restoration effectively increased the SOC content. In comparison to CK, the SOC content was relatively high in SD (12.82 ± 0.59 g/kg–18.50 ± 0.97 g/kg) and SH (14.67 ± 0.22 g/kg–20.15 ± 0.91 g/kg) following vegetation restoration in the 0–20 and 20–40 cm soil layers (P < 0.05). This depends on the difference in biomass produced by different tree species' combinations, and high plant carbon inputs in SD (388.45 ± 44.61 g/kg) and SH (424.88 ± 18.92 g/kg) treatments will accelerate the return of carbon to soil. The results of the random forest and PLS-PM models identified that microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and microbial necromass carbon (MNC) were the two most important SOC predictors, which promote SOC accumulation in conjunction with plant-derived carbon. Further, it was also found that soil nutrient availability enhanced SOC accumulation by promoting the production of MNC. This process was negatively associated with carbon-acquiring enzyme activities. This study could provide a reference for the selection of SOC sequestration vegetation restoration strategies in tropical forests of southern China.
不同热带植被恢复策略下植物碳输入和土壤微生物对土壤有机碳积累的影响
植被恢复是改善退化农业生态系统土壤固碳的重要措施。然而,不同植被恢复策略对热带地区土壤有机碳动态的影响已经较为明确。以裸地(CK)和次生林(SF)为对照和对照,研究了海南合欢×蓝荷(HH)、木香×黄檀(SD)、木香×海南合欢(AH)和海南合欢×海南合欢(SH) 4种植被恢复策略在0 ~ 20 cm、20 ~ 40 cm和40 ~ 60 cm土壤剖面上的有机碳、生物和非生物因子。结果表明,植被恢复有效地提高了土壤有机碳含量。与对照相比,植被恢复后0-20 cm和20-40 cm土层土壤有机碳含量在SD(12.82±0.59 g/kg ~ 18.50±0.97 g/kg)和SH(14.67±0.22 g/kg ~ 20.15±0.91 g/kg)中相对较高(P <;0.05)。这取决于不同树种组合产生的生物量的差异,而高碳输入的SD(388.45±44.61 g/kg)和SH(424.88±18.92 g/kg)处理将加速碳向土壤的归还。随机森林模型和PLS-PM模型结果表明,微生物生物量碳(MBC)和微生物坏死碳(MNC)是两个最重要的有机碳预测因子,它们与植物源碳一起促进有机碳积累。此外,土壤养分有效性通过促进跨国公司的生产来促进有机碳积累。这一过程与碳获取酶活性呈负相关。本研究可为南方热带森林固碳植被恢复策略的选择提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信