Riaan van Tonder, Hofmeyr Viljoen, Christelle Ackermann
{"title":"Radiological Correlates of Head Injuries in School-Level Rugby Union: A 10-Year Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis","authors":"Riaan van Tonder, Hofmeyr Viljoen, Christelle Ackermann","doi":"10.1007/s40279-025-02195-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Sport-related concussion (SRC) in rugby union is common and carries a high injury burden, especially among children. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is commonly used to assess rugby-related head injuries, including SRC, subjecting children to ionising radiation. In addition, there is concern about the relationship between SRC, repetitive head impacts and neurodegeneration.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To review and correlate the imaging findings of head injuries in school-level rugby players from a public tertiary referral centre and a private multi-centre radiology service.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>Descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional correlational study for the 2014–2023 period.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Anonymised data were collected from the radiological information systems of a tertiary referral centre and a private radiology provider. Data included participant age, imaging modality, study type, date, findings and SRC status. The public and private datasets were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 369 cases were identified (public <i>n</i> = 132, 36%). Mean participant age was 15 (± 2.5) years, with 78% (<i>n</i> = 289) clinically deemed to have an SRC. CT was performed in 347 (94%) cases, with abnormal findings reported in 50 studies (public <i>n</i> = 32). The most common findings were craniofacial fractures (<i>n</i> = 28) and intracranial injuries (<i>n</i> = 19). The sensitivity of CT for detecting SRC was 14%. Public sector participants were more likely to have an SRC (odds ratio: 8.39; 95% CI 8.37–8.41, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>CT demonstrates limited utility in the context of SRC beyond detecting craniofacial fractures or surgical emergencies, reinforcing clinical assessment as the diagnostic cornerstone. Protocol optimisation should prioritise radiation risk mitigation through strict adherence to paediatric low-dose guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02195-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sport-related concussion (SRC) in rugby union is common and carries a high injury burden, especially among children. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is commonly used to assess rugby-related head injuries, including SRC, subjecting children to ionising radiation. In addition, there is concern about the relationship between SRC, repetitive head impacts and neurodegeneration.
Objective
To review and correlate the imaging findings of head injuries in school-level rugby players from a public tertiary referral centre and a private multi-centre radiology service.
Design
Descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional correlational study for the 2014–2023 period.
Methods
Anonymised data were collected from the radiological information systems of a tertiary referral centre and a private radiology provider. Data included participant age, imaging modality, study type, date, findings and SRC status. The public and private datasets were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics.
Results
A total of 369 cases were identified (public n = 132, 36%). Mean participant age was 15 (± 2.5) years, with 78% (n = 289) clinically deemed to have an SRC. CT was performed in 347 (94%) cases, with abnormal findings reported in 50 studies (public n = 32). The most common findings were craniofacial fractures (n = 28) and intracranial injuries (n = 19). The sensitivity of CT for detecting SRC was 14%. Public sector participants were more likely to have an SRC (odds ratio: 8.39; 95% CI 8.37–8.41, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
CT demonstrates limited utility in the context of SRC beyond detecting craniofacial fractures or surgical emergencies, reinforcing clinical assessment as the diagnostic cornerstone. Protocol optimisation should prioritise radiation risk mitigation through strict adherence to paediatric low-dose guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports.
Types of Articles:
Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings.
Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field.
Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles.
Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content.
Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances.
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.