Cognitive and clinical profiles in first-episode psychosis and their relationship with functional outcomes

Megan Cowman, Jo Hodgekins, Siân Lowri Griffiths, Emma Frawley, Karen O’Connor, David Fowler, Max Birchwood, Gary Donohoe
{"title":"Cognitive and clinical profiles in first-episode psychosis and their relationship with functional outcomes","authors":"Megan Cowman, Jo Hodgekins, Siân Lowri Griffiths, Emma Frawley, Karen O’Connor, David Fowler, Max Birchwood, Gary Donohoe","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>While cognitive impairment is a core feature of psychosis, significant heterogeneity in cognitive and clinical outcomes is observed.</p><span>Aims</span><p>The aim of this study was to identify cognitive and clinical subgroups in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and determine if these profiles were linked to functional outcomes over time.</p><span>Method</span><p>A total of 323 individuals with FEP were included. Two-step hierarchical and <span>k</span>-means cluster analyses were performed using baseline cognitive and clinical variables. General linear mixed models were used to investigate whether baseline cognitive and clinical clusters were associated with functioning at follow-up time points (6–9, 12 and 15 months).</p><span>Results</span><p>Three distinct cognitive clusters were identified: a cognitively intact group (<span>N</span> = 59), a moderately impaired group (<span>N</span>= 77) and a more severely impaired group (<span>N</span>= 122). Three distinct clinical clusters were identified: a subgroup characterised by predominant mood symptoms (<span>N</span> = 76), a subgroup characterised by predominant negative symptoms (<span>N</span>= 19) and a subgroup characterised by overall mild symptom severity (<span>N</span> = 94). The subgroup with more severely impaired cognition also had more severe negative symptoms at baseline. Cognitive clusters were significantly associated with later social and occupational function, and associated with changes over time. Clinical clusters were associated with later social functioning but not occupational functioning, and were not associated with changes over time.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Baseline cognitive impairments are predictive of both later social and occupational function and change over time. This suggests that cognitive profiles offer valuable information in terms of prognosis and treatment needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While cognitive impairment is a core feature of psychosis, significant heterogeneity in cognitive and clinical outcomes is observed.

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify cognitive and clinical subgroups in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and determine if these profiles were linked to functional outcomes over time.

Method

A total of 323 individuals with FEP were included. Two-step hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses were performed using baseline cognitive and clinical variables. General linear mixed models were used to investigate whether baseline cognitive and clinical clusters were associated with functioning at follow-up time points (6–9, 12 and 15 months).

Results

Three distinct cognitive clusters were identified: a cognitively intact group (N = 59), a moderately impaired group (N= 77) and a more severely impaired group (N= 122). Three distinct clinical clusters were identified: a subgroup characterised by predominant mood symptoms (N = 76), a subgroup characterised by predominant negative symptoms (N= 19) and a subgroup characterised by overall mild symptom severity (N = 94). The subgroup with more severely impaired cognition also had more severe negative symptoms at baseline. Cognitive clusters were significantly associated with later social and occupational function, and associated with changes over time. Clinical clusters were associated with later social functioning but not occupational functioning, and were not associated with changes over time.

Conclusions

Baseline cognitive impairments are predictive of both later social and occupational function and change over time. This suggests that cognitive profiles offer valuable information in terms of prognosis and treatment needs.

首发精神病的认知和临床特征及其与功能结局的关系
虽然认知障碍是精神病的核心特征,但观察到认知和临床结果的显著异质性。本研究的目的是确定首发精神病(FEP)的认知和临床亚组,并确定这些特征是否与长期的功能结局有关。方法共纳入323例FEP患者。使用基线认知和临床变量进行两步分层和k-均值聚类分析。使用一般线性混合模型来调查基线认知和临床群集是否与随访时间点(6 - 9,12和15个月)的功能相关。结果分为认知完整组(N= 59)、中度受损组(N= 77)和重度受损组(N= 122)。确定了三个不同的临床聚类:以主要情绪症状为特征的亚组(N= 76),以主要阴性症状为特征的亚组(N= 19)和以总体轻度症状严重程度为特征的亚组(N= 94)。认知功能受损更严重的亚组在基线时也有更严重的阴性症状。认知集群与后来的社会和职业功能显著相关,并随时间变化而变化。临床群集与后来的社会功能有关,但与职业功能无关,并且与时间的变化无关。结论基线认知障碍可预测以后的社会和职业功能,并随时间变化。这表明认知概况在预后和治疗需求方面提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信