Differential effects of anesthetics and sex on supraventricular electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation substrate in rats

IF 5.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Michael Murninkas, Or Levi, Sigal Elyagon, Aviv Komissar, Neta Marom, Alon Naumchik, Noam Dalal, Gideon Gradwohl, Yoram Etzion
{"title":"Differential effects of anesthetics and sex on supraventricular electrophysiology and atrial fibrillation substrate in rats","authors":"Michael Murninkas, Or Levi, Sigal Elyagon, Aviv Komissar, Neta Marom, Alon Naumchik, Noam Dalal, Gideon Gradwohl, Yoram Etzion","doi":"10.1038/s41684-025-01532-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rodents are increasingly used in atrial electrophysiology research, yet such studies are often performed under anesthesia owing to technical challenges. Here we developed an implantable device for comprehensive atrial studies in ambulatory rats and investigated the effects of commonly used anesthetics on supraventricular electrophysiology and arrhythmic substrate, comparing them with the unanesthetized state (UAS). Adult rats were evaluated 4 weeks after implantation. Studies were conducted in the UAS under 2% isoflurane (ISO) and under 40 mg/kg pentobarbital (PEN). Pacing protocols determined various parameters, including sinoatrial node recovery time, atrioventricular node effective refractory period and atrial effective refractory period. Arrhythmic substrate was assessed after 20 triggering bursts per condition, and arrhythmic tendency was analyzed manually and through the complexity ratio, an unbiased measure recently developed by our group. PEN mildly increased heart rate in both sexes, while ISO did not affect heart rate but prolonged the corrected sinus node recovery time in males. PEN increased atrioventricular node effective refractory period in both sexes, while ISO affected males only. Both ISO and PEN prolonged atrial effective refractory period compared with UAS in both sexes. Arrhythmic measures were higher in males and were attenuated by ISO and, to a lesser extent, by PEN in males only. The dominant frequency of arrhythmic events was reduced by both anesthetics in both sexes. These findings demonstrate a significant impact of commonly used anesthetics on rat supraventricular electrophysiology, with sex-based differences, highlighting the importance of methodologies that enable cardiac electrophysiology studies in unanesthetized rodents. The authors used an implantable electrophysiological device to assess the effects of two commonly used anesthetics (isoflurane and pentobarbital) on supraventricular electrophysiology and arrhythmic substrate in male and female rats.","PeriodicalId":17936,"journal":{"name":"Lab Animal","volume":"54 4","pages":"80-91"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41684-025-01532-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lab Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41684-025-01532-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rodents are increasingly used in atrial electrophysiology research, yet such studies are often performed under anesthesia owing to technical challenges. Here we developed an implantable device for comprehensive atrial studies in ambulatory rats and investigated the effects of commonly used anesthetics on supraventricular electrophysiology and arrhythmic substrate, comparing them with the unanesthetized state (UAS). Adult rats were evaluated 4 weeks after implantation. Studies were conducted in the UAS under 2% isoflurane (ISO) and under 40 mg/kg pentobarbital (PEN). Pacing protocols determined various parameters, including sinoatrial node recovery time, atrioventricular node effective refractory period and atrial effective refractory period. Arrhythmic substrate was assessed after 20 triggering bursts per condition, and arrhythmic tendency was analyzed manually and through the complexity ratio, an unbiased measure recently developed by our group. PEN mildly increased heart rate in both sexes, while ISO did not affect heart rate but prolonged the corrected sinus node recovery time in males. PEN increased atrioventricular node effective refractory period in both sexes, while ISO affected males only. Both ISO and PEN prolonged atrial effective refractory period compared with UAS in both sexes. Arrhythmic measures were higher in males and were attenuated by ISO and, to a lesser extent, by PEN in males only. The dominant frequency of arrhythmic events was reduced by both anesthetics in both sexes. These findings demonstrate a significant impact of commonly used anesthetics on rat supraventricular electrophysiology, with sex-based differences, highlighting the importance of methodologies that enable cardiac electrophysiology studies in unanesthetized rodents. The authors used an implantable electrophysiological device to assess the effects of two commonly used anesthetics (isoflurane and pentobarbital) on supraventricular electrophysiology and arrhythmic substrate in male and female rats.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lab Animal
Lab Animal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
181
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: LabAnimal is a Nature Research journal dedicated to in vivo science and technology that improves our basic understanding and use of model organisms of human health and disease. In addition to basic research, methods and technologies, LabAnimal also covers important news, business and regulatory matters that impact the development and application of model organisms for preclinical research. LabAnimal's focus is on innovative in vivo methods, research and technology covering a wide range of model organisms. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. LabAnimal provides a rigorous and fair peer review of manuscripts, high standards for copyediting and production, and efficient publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信