Navigating AI writing tools in medical education: A SWOT analysis of L2 academic writing perspectives

IF 3.3 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Farhad Pakdel, Laleh Khojasteh, Reza Kafipour, Zahra Shahsavar
{"title":"Navigating AI writing tools in medical education: A SWOT analysis of L2 academic writing perspectives","authors":"Farhad Pakdel, Laleh Khojasteh, Reza Kafipour, Zahra Shahsavar","doi":"10.1177/13621688251322953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools in second language (L2) academic writing presents both opportunities and challenges for medical education. This study employed a SWOT (strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats) analysis to examine medical students’ perspectives on using AI writing tools in their academic writing practice. Forty-two medical students from a major Iranian university participated in the study, providing weekly reflections and a final SWOT analysis over a 15-week academic writing course. Thematic analysis revealed that AI writing tools offer significant strengths in linguistic skill development, particularly in academic vocabulary enhancement, sentence improvement, and grammar and proofreading. However, weaknesses such as over-reliance on AI, lack of contextual understanding, and occasional inaccuracies in suggestions were identified. Opportunities included creative writing enhancement and immediate language refinement, while threats encompassed challenges in human–computer interaction, including the potential for misinformation and academic dishonesty. The study highlights the need for a balanced approach in integrating AI writing tools into L2 writing instruction, emphasizing their role as supplementary aids rather than primary writing resources. Implications for pedagogy include developing curricula that teach critical evaluation of AI-generated content and implementing writing tasks that require higher-order thinking skills. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on AI in education and provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers in navigating the evolving landscape of AI-assisted writing in medical education.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251322953","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools in second language (L2) academic writing presents both opportunities and challenges for medical education. This study employed a SWOT (strengths–weaknesses–opportunities–threats) analysis to examine medical students’ perspectives on using AI writing tools in their academic writing practice. Forty-two medical students from a major Iranian university participated in the study, providing weekly reflections and a final SWOT analysis over a 15-week academic writing course. Thematic analysis revealed that AI writing tools offer significant strengths in linguistic skill development, particularly in academic vocabulary enhancement, sentence improvement, and grammar and proofreading. However, weaknesses such as over-reliance on AI, lack of contextual understanding, and occasional inaccuracies in suggestions were identified. Opportunities included creative writing enhancement and immediate language refinement, while threats encompassed challenges in human–computer interaction, including the potential for misinformation and academic dishonesty. The study highlights the need for a balanced approach in integrating AI writing tools into L2 writing instruction, emphasizing their role as supplementary aids rather than primary writing resources. Implications for pedagogy include developing curricula that teach critical evaluation of AI-generated content and implementing writing tasks that require higher-order thinking skills. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on AI in education and provides valuable insights for educators and policymakers in navigating the evolving landscape of AI-assisted writing in medical education.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信