Fit and Fracture Load of Milled and 3D Printed Composite Onlays, an In Vitro Study.

Rani D'haese, Charlotte Hermans, Jana Hauspie, Stefan Vandeweghe
{"title":"Fit and Fracture Load of Milled and 3D Printed Composite Onlays, an In Vitro Study.","authors":"Rani D'haese, Charlotte Hermans, Jana Hauspie, Stefan Vandeweghe","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fit and fracture load of 3D printed and milled composite onlays.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An onlay preparation of a lower right molar was duplicated 28 times by means of 3D printing (Model 2.0, Nextdent, 3D systems, Soesterburg, the Netherlands). Fourteen onlays were milled (Brilliant Crios, Coltène, Whaledent AG, Switzerland) and 14 onlays were 3D printed (Nextdent C&B MHF, 3D systems, Soesterburg, the Netherlands). The marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the silicone-replica technique. For each impression, two sections were made in the silicone material. Each slice was photographed using a digital microscope and 13 measurements were performed on both slices using ImageJ. Next the onlays were cemented on their corresponding models (relyX Universal/SBU+, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and tested in a universal testing machine (AGS-X, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) to determine the fracture load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The printed onlays showed a significant better marginal and internal fit (p<0.05). The marginal and internal fit for the 3D printed onlays was respectively 78µm (SD 23µm) and 222µm (SD 30µm) and for the milled onlays 100µm (SD 38µm) and 249µm (SD 55µm). In contrast, the milled onlays showed significant better results in terms of fracture load (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limits of this in vitro study, the printing process demonstrated a better fit, but with lower mechanical properties. Both the fit of the 3D printed and milled composite onlays were within the clinical acceptable limits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the fit and fracture load of 3D printed and milled composite onlays.

Materials and methods: An onlay preparation of a lower right molar was duplicated 28 times by means of 3D printing (Model 2.0, Nextdent, 3D systems, Soesterburg, the Netherlands). Fourteen onlays were milled (Brilliant Crios, Coltène, Whaledent AG, Switzerland) and 14 onlays were 3D printed (Nextdent C&B MHF, 3D systems, Soesterburg, the Netherlands). The marginal and internal fit were evaluated using the silicone-replica technique. For each impression, two sections were made in the silicone material. Each slice was photographed using a digital microscope and 13 measurements were performed on both slices using ImageJ. Next the onlays were cemented on their corresponding models (relyX Universal/SBU+, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and tested in a universal testing machine (AGS-X, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) to determine the fracture load.

Results: The printed onlays showed a significant better marginal and internal fit (p<0.05). The marginal and internal fit for the 3D printed onlays was respectively 78µm (SD 23µm) and 222µm (SD 30µm) and for the milled onlays 100µm (SD 38µm) and 249µm (SD 55µm). In contrast, the milled onlays showed significant better results in terms of fracture load (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Within the limits of this in vitro study, the printing process demonstrated a better fit, but with lower mechanical properties. Both the fit of the 3D printed and milled composite onlays were within the clinical acceptable limits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信