Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Wear Resistance of Additively and Subtractively Manufactured CAD-CAM Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Bersu Bedirhandede, Emre Tokar
{"title":"Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Wear Resistance of Additively and Subtractively Manufactured CAD-CAM Dental Materials: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Bersu Bedirhandede, Emre Tokar","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the wear resistance and surface roughness of subtractively manufactured resin matrix ceramics and additively manufactured hybrid composites, both subjected to different surface treatments and thermomechanical aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two additively manufactured materials and one subtractively manufactured polymer-infiltrated resin ceramic were used to fabricate square-shaped specimens.These specimens were divided into two subgroups based on surface treatment (n = 12). After surface roughness measurements and SEM analysis, the specimens were subjected to thermomechanical aging. Pre- and post-aging scans were analyzed to calculate wear depth. Surface roughness and SEM analyses were repeated, and 2-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test was used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glazed surfaces exhibited significantly higher wear depth than polished ones (p = .018). Vita Enamic showed significantly greater wear depth compared to both VarseoSmile Crown Plus (p = 0.002) and P-Crown V2 (p = 0.001). For polished surfaces, Vita Enamic had significantly greater wear depth than VarseoSmile Crown. Plus (p = 0.001) and P-Crown V2 (p < .05). Initially, surface roughness values for glazed surfaces were similar (p = .076), but aging increased roughness significantly, with glazed P Crown V2 being rougher than glazed VarseoSmile Crown Plus (p = .001). After aging, glazed surfaces had significantly higher surface roughness than polished ones across all materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Material type and surface treatment affected surface roughness and wear depth during thermomechanical aging. Glazed surfaces showed higher wear depth and roughness, with the glaze layer removed after aging. Polished surfaces exhibited greater wear for subtractive materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the wear resistance and surface roughness of subtractively manufactured resin matrix ceramics and additively manufactured hybrid composites, both subjected to different surface treatments and thermomechanical aging.

Materials and methods: Two additively manufactured materials and one subtractively manufactured polymer-infiltrated resin ceramic were used to fabricate square-shaped specimens.These specimens were divided into two subgroups based on surface treatment (n = 12). After surface roughness measurements and SEM analysis, the specimens were subjected to thermomechanical aging. Pre- and post-aging scans were analyzed to calculate wear depth. Surface roughness and SEM analyses were repeated, and 2-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Glazed surfaces exhibited significantly higher wear depth than polished ones (p = .018). Vita Enamic showed significantly greater wear depth compared to both VarseoSmile Crown Plus (p = 0.002) and P-Crown V2 (p = 0.001). For polished surfaces, Vita Enamic had significantly greater wear depth than VarseoSmile Crown. Plus (p = 0.001) and P-Crown V2 (p < .05). Initially, surface roughness values for glazed surfaces were similar (p = .076), but aging increased roughness significantly, with glazed P Crown V2 being rougher than glazed VarseoSmile Crown Plus (p = .001). After aging, glazed surfaces had significantly higher surface roughness than polished ones across all materials.

Conclusion: Material type and surface treatment affected surface roughness and wear depth during thermomechanical aging. Glazed surfaces showed higher wear depth and roughness, with the glaze layer removed after aging. Polished surfaces exhibited greater wear for subtractive materials.

加减法制造CAD-CAM牙科材料的表面粗糙度和耐磨性评价:体外研究。
目的:评价减法制备的树脂基陶瓷和增材制备的混杂复合材料的耐磨性和表面粗糙度,这两种材料均经过不同的表面处理和热机械老化。材料与方法:采用两种增材制造材料和一种减材制造聚合物渗透树脂陶瓷制备方形试样。这些标本根据表面处理分为两亚组(n = 12)。经过表面粗糙度测量和扫描电镜分析,试样进行了热机械时效处理。对预老化和后老化扫描进行分析以计算磨损深度。重复表面粗糙度和扫描电镜分析,采用2-way方差分析和Tukey’s HSD检验进行统计分析。结果:釉面表面的磨损深度明显高于抛光表面(p = 0.018)。与VarseoSmile Crown Plus (p = 0.002)和p -Crown V2 (p = 0.001)相比,Vita Enamic显示出更大的磨损深度。对于抛光表面,Vita Enamic的磨损深度明显大于VarseoSmile Crown。+ (p = 0.001)和p - crown V2 (p < 0.05)。最初,釉面表面的粗糙度值相似(p = 0.076),但老化显著增加了粗糙度,釉面p Crown V2比釉面VarseoSmile Crown Plus更粗糙(p = 0.001)。老化后,在所有材料中,光滑表面的表面粗糙度明显高于抛光表面。结论:材料类型和表面处理影响热机械时效过程中表面粗糙度和磨损深度。釉面磨损深度和粗糙度较高,老化后釉面脱落。磨光表面对减法材料的磨损更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信